From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D78C4321D for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E91E21509 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QSn6wkAT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E91E21509 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727709AbeHOWUB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2018 18:20:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:40506 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725941AbeHOWUA (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2018 18:20:00 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x5-v6so919128pgp.7; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:26:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=48u/BImmfj7dT4scPmdA91KJouWhuBqJWqwCJp/3MQw=; b=QSn6wkATDaQYMK7JrFG3QvnwgUns2q/AD1tg7mcJJhrzdkXZZ/1VSxCD7d2DCAFlO9 MWIqedJXOEWWT/vVFSpEUXxEeRiv0w9gyn7jZMy8VroGxFBJ0GwF5jIp9o3l93O9rU2c /JmP/6tjzWkfN2dVyELtQhaaRkFsBQArlaDquubSCVVqVjjjTf/Qq2BNGUY4xzaV/mGk ht3j2V5xPyKNFazFgdPhVTtv4zyUocXmK/uEuMVMnr221i9ouNR+IOnJEuPyjWdwBzBq AEErfXLtIEYvSbiyvRDOtWqvdUj8Y07QfwNlOoNamcE7mJYzg6ufruxp+qfrB0Vrbjhc k3Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=48u/BImmfj7dT4scPmdA91KJouWhuBqJWqwCJp/3MQw=; b=C7j+qnTbtubLcbxJA66/xqpeZUib5/L9XsjK/0K7H03DqaVCnKzYe4RKmPvKLEvuZS pwwHcalr+rTcSyzIn0RSD9fDTpXjRQtGQNGo05OsNsARQoUHpuL5fJYN2UaPMlcXp361 SvCjNwzqpsxjQXBpIwq+v2oyjWHbLwJCAl8beagJUGCkk269Fx1vYWhyKfxSuYBxPn0r si5l0/69dFOdBinSsa3mXm0laJ9kk7F1LJYDNzQmQZDLOb2Ww/whDcoJoi6bDVaZVZ4j umS4Tw4LlWKDnUQiy67IdATKR3A8eyGIupX1KvtsZrbnggD5kdrp8n8LDdqGFSfshwiB oNeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF4S4ug8F8V1twCoB5rls3F6YXPDxl0M1TWW6WM8KxppJfBBdkQ pQ9yozt6fqWsBDKR+Vnp7oXrk4FG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPzY6XoYFfx1UgajJGah+7HLnqGcWX4p/3+hxPlw1rGZmaER9iZXc2JxhcplZFjC124evit27g== X-Received: by 2002:a62:b40c:: with SMTP id h12-v6mr29278732pfn.18.1534361192419; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.223.40.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r198-v6sm54932955pgr.8.2018.08.15.12.26.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:26:30 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Sebastian Gottschall Cc: Sven Joachim , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/107] 4.9.120-stable review Message-ID: <20180815192630.GA20575@roeck-us.net> References: <20180814171520.883143803@linuxfoundation.org> <6272e062-6cfc-0669-bebf-ebb039da051a@dd-wrt.com> <87k1orms9i.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <55df6754-ce8c-520a-13f9-c610ac498173@dd-wrt.com> <20180815185553.GA18219@roeck-us.net> <69700876-f31a-ea0a-bdea-2e82b7a5d308@dd-wrt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <69700876-f31a-ea0a-bdea-2e82b7a5d308@dd-wrt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:08:08PM +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > > Am 15.08.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > >On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:27:00PM +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > >>if i fix the other error (can be reproduced with disable smp on standard > >>i386 build) > >> > >>another raises up again related to smp. to be serious. this patchset of x86 > >>patches is absolutelly broken and put together without any care. not a > >>simple compile test has been done > >> > >>sorry for beeing a little bit upset. i'm sure i will find other bugs if i go > >>deeper > >> > >It might possibly help if you would consider to publish your configuration(s). > > > >As for "not a simple compile test has been done", please have a look > >at http://kerneltests.org/builders. I guess those compile (and boot) > >tests don't count as "simple". I assume the same applies to all the > >builds done by 0day and all the other test builders. > > > >Guenter > > it was nothing special. just a standard x86 build with smp disabled. that > triggers all of them. so this should be a common build configuration for > testing > these issues are covered by the rc3 patch of 4.9 right now > > the issue reported by sven can be triggered by just compiling rtc-cmos.c > which is caused by the change in dmi.h  (asm/io.h was replaced by > linux/io.h) > so this driver should be included in all x86 and x64 builds and must be > uncovered in any simple compile test > > btw. this issue is still unresolved but simple to fix > > --- arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h        (revision 36620) > +++ arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h        (working copy) > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ >  #define _ASM_X86_I8259_H > >  #include > +#include > Also seen in mainline. Meaning my non-SMP test builds are broken. Hmm. Anyway, care to send a proper patch ? I am sure Linus will be more than happy to apply it. Thanks, Guenter