On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:20:38 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:43:34 +0100 > Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > > > > Overall am still not able to clear visualize on how MTD bindings with > > nvmem cells would look in both partition and un-partition usecases? > > An example DT would be nice here!! > > Something along those lines: We must also have a compatible string on the nvmem-cells node to make sure we don't clash with the old style MTD partitions, or some other device specific binding. > > mtdnode { > nvmem-cells { compatible = "nvmem-cells"; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > > cell@0 { > reg = <0x0 0x14>; > }; > }; > > partitions { > compatible = "fixed-partitions"; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > > partition@0 { > reg = <0x0 0x20000>; > > nvmem-cells { compatible = "nvmem-cells"; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > > cell@0 { > reg = <0x0 0x10>; > }; > }; > }; > }; > }; Alban