From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: don't miss the last page because of round-off error
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:15:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821171555.GA16545@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALYGNiOf_0fR4R747J11JNROO7_FW_9u16Bg09f+CdWPiFwGvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:11:44AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 04:18:34PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >> - scan = div64_u64(scan * fraction[file],
> >> - denominator);
> >> + if (scan > 1)
> >> + scan = div64_u64(scan * fraction[file],
> >> + denominator);
> >
> > Wouldn't we be better off doing a div_round_up? ie:
> >
> > scan = div64_u64(scan * fraction[file] + denominator - 1, denominator);
> >
> > although i'd rather hide that in a new macro in math64.h than opencode it
> > here.
>
> All numbers here should be up to nr_pages * 200 and fit into unsigned long.
> I see no reason for u64. If they overflow then u64 wouldn't help either.
It is nr_pages * 200 * recent_scanned, where recent_scanned can be up
to four times of what's on the LRUs. That can overflow a u32 with even
small amounts of memory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 23:18 [PATCH RFC] mm: don't miss the last page because of round-off error Roman Gushchin
2018-08-18 1:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-20 17:19 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-08-21 5:11 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2018-08-21 13:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-21 17:15 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2018-08-22 6:01 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2018-08-22 17:50 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821171555.GA16545@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).