From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781A8C4321D for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3917E21564 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:48:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3917E21564 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727602AbeHXQWy (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:22:54 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:47885 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726268AbeHXQWx (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:22:53 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 13E7A20728; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:48:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bbrezillon (AAubervilliers-681-1-53-19.w90-88.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.88.170.19]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0AEE207B1; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:48:10 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Liang Yang Cc: Yixun Lan , , Rob Herring , Neil Armstrong , Martin Blumenstingl , Richard Weinberger , , Marek Vasut , Jian Hu , Kevin Hilman , Carlo Caione , , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , , Jerome Brunet Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller Message-ID: <20180824144810.31c929a5@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <96e538a5-1232-11f2-8b9e-5ddb09dcc2de@amlogic.com> References: <20180719094612.5833-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20180719094612.5833-3-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20180801235045.5b4d8211@bbrezillon> <42877a0d-9830-0626-3f64-e49a326eaa3c@amlogic.com> <20180817155608.5929b37a@bbrezillon> <96e538a5-1232-11f2-8b9e-5ddb09dcc2de@amlogic.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:08:42 +0800 Liang Yang wrote: > > You have to wait tWB, that's for sure. > > > we have a maximum 32 commands fifo. when command is written into > NFC_REG_CMD, it doesn't mean that command is executing right now, maybe > it is buffering on the queue.Assume one ERASE operation, when 2nd > command(0xd0) is written into NFC_REG_CMD and then come into > NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR, if I read the RB status by register, it may be > wrong because 0xd0 may not being executed. it is unusual unless > buffering two many command. You should flush the queue and wait for it to empty at the end of ->exec_op(). > so it seems that i still need to use nand_soft_waitrdy or wait cmd is > executed somewhere. Don't you have a WAIT_FOR_RB instruction? What is NFC_CMD_RB for? Also, NFC_CMD_IDLE seems to allow you to add an arbitrary delay, and that's probably what you should use for tWB.