From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111D3C433F4 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F852064A for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:45:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B9F852064A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727344AbeHYBVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:21:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35952 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726746AbeHYBVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:21:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313E880D; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dupont (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4514D3F2EA; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:45:06 -0500 From: Kim Phillips To: Thomas-Mich Richter Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ravi Bangoria , Anton Blanchard , Robin Murphy , Alexander Shishkin , Christian Borntraeger , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Taeung Song , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , , , perf group Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update Message-Id: <20180824164506.aa6e54bceb1ffb7b3dc70733@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <18abf031-f803-b8e6-129e-ed50c63e73d0@linux.ibm.com> References: <20180823191047.9260992844205984b75e6721@arm.com> <18abf031-f803-b8e6-129e-ed50c63e73d0@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Arm X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200 Thomas-Mich Richter wrote: > On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files. > > Tested, no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know. Thanks! An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of emails in the future. I doubt your official Tested-by implies you necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp. if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above. BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing. Again, thanks for testing! Kim