From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:56:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829155648.e4ec141bf7c66b3f13433ffa@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829024224.GA6083@kroah.com>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 19:42:24 -0700 Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > --- lnx-416.orig/include/uapi/linux/keyctl.h
> > +++ lnx-416/include/uapi/linux/keyctl.h
> > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
> >
> > /* keyctl structures */
> > struct keyctl_dh_params {
> > - __s32 private;
> > + __s32 dh_private;
>
> Ick ick ick, why not just put the C "namespace" on all uapi files if you
> are including them from c++ code? I'm sure this isn't the only problem
> that has this problem, right?
>
> This is valid C, no need to start worrying about C++ reserved names.
We've done this before and it's a simple enough change in order to be
friendly toward others.
That being said, it's been like this for two years so presumably anyone
who is using this header from C++ is already `extern "C" { ...}' around
their #include.
I'm OK with the patch as-is, but if we run into this issue more often,
we might want to look at doing something kernel-wide.
I'm not sure what though. Adding
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
...
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
into every uapi file might work. Unpleasing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-28 23:34 [PATCH resend] uapi/linux/keyctl.h: don't use C++ reserved keyword as a struct member name Randy Dunlap
2018-08-29 2:42 ` Greg KH
2018-08-29 22:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2018-09-09 22:00 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2018-09-10 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2018-09-22 0:03 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829155648.e4ec141bf7c66b3f13433ffa@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).