linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Yelena Krivosheev <yelena@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: mvneta: some bug fix and trivial improvement
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:51:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829165131.52798cd6@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829164024.41e8439d@xhacker.debian>

On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:40:24 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:25:57 +0800
> Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> 
> > patch1 fixes rx_offset_correction set and usage. Because the
> > rx_offset_correction is RX packet offset correction for platforms,
> > it's not related with SW BM, instead, it's only related with the
> > platform's NET_SKB_PAD.
> > 
> > patch2 fixes the wrong function to unmap rx buf  
> 
> I have question about the following two commits:
> 
> 7e47fd84b56b ("net: mvneta: Allocate page for the descriptor"), it cause
> a waste, for normal 1500 MTU, before this patch we allocate 1920Bytes for rx
> after this patch, we always allocate PAGE_SIZE bytes, if PAGE_SIZE=4096, we
> waste 53% memory for each rx buf. I'm not sure whether the performance
> improvement deserve the pay.
> 
> 562e2f467e71 ("net: mvneta: Improve the buffer allocation method for SWBM")
> mentions that "With system having a small memory (around 256MB), the state
> "cannot allocate memory to refill with new buffer" is reach pretty quickly"
> is it due to the memory waste as said above? Anyway, by this commit, we
> want to improve the situation on a small memory system, so should we firstly
> revert commit 7e47fd84b56b ("net: mvneta: Allocate page for the descriptor")?
> 

If maintainers decide to revert the two commits: 7e47fd84b56b and 562e2f467e71
then, patch1,2,3 are useless, we can drop them. Only patch4 and patch5 are
still useful.

Thanks

> Any comments are welcome!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> > 
> > patch3 removes the NETIF_F_GRO check ourself, because the net subsystem
> > will handle it for us.
> > 
> > patch4 enables NETIF_F_RXCSUM by default, since the driver and HW
> > supports the feature.
> > 
> > patch5 is a trivial optimization, to reduce smp_processor_id() calling
> > in mvneta_tx_done_gbe.
> > 
> > Jisheng Zhang (5):
> >   net: mvneta: fix rx_offset_correction set and usage
> >   net: mvneta: fix the wrong function to unmap rx buf
> >   net: mvneta: Don't check NETIF_F_GRO ourself
> >   net: mvneta: enable NETIF_F_RXCSUM by default
> >   net: mvneta: reduce smp_processor_id() calling in mvneta_tx_done_gbe
> > 
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 49 ++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >   
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-29  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-29  8:25 [PATCH 0/5] net: mvneta: some bug fix and trivial improvement Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  8:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: mvneta: fix rx_offset_correction set and usage Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  9:05   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29  9:16     ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  8:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: mvneta: fix the wrong function to unmap rx buf Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  9:21   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-30  3:40     ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  8:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: mvneta: Don't check NETIF_F_GRO ourself Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  9:37   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29  8:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] net: mvneta: enable NETIF_F_RXCSUM by default Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  9:38   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29 13:08   ` Andrew Lunn
2018-08-30  3:27     ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-30  3:44       ` Andrew Lunn
2018-08-29  8:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: mvneta: reduce smp_processor_id() calling in mvneta_tx_done_gbe Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  9:44   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-08-29  8:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] net: mvneta: some bug fix and trivial improvement Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29  8:51   ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-08-30  3:53     ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-29 13:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-08-30  3:42   ` Jisheng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180829165131.52798cd6@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=yelena@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).