From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ADEC433F4 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A860420644 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A860420644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727863AbeH3Cx0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:53:26 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:51000 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727394AbeH3CxX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:53:23 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7TMsBnH000586 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:54:14 -0400 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m60r18mqe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:54:14 -0400 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:54:13 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:54:09 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7TMs8Uu27852960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:54:08 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87323B2064; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:53:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D67B2065; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:53:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.159]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:53:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8683D16C91D2; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rculist.h Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:53:52 -0700 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180829225340.GA7019@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180829225340.GA7019@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082922-0052-0000-0000-0000032821BD X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009636; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01080749; UDB=6.00557500; IPR=6.00860734; MB=3.00023002; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-29 22:54:13 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082922-0053-0000-0000-00005DE60101 Message-Id: <20180829225405.7275-11-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-29_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808290223 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- include/linux/rculist.h | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h index 4786c2235b98..e91ec9ddcd30 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline void list_replace_rcu(struct list_head *old, * @list: the RCU-protected list to splice * @prev: points to the last element of the existing list * @next: points to the first element of the existing list - * @sync: function to sync: synchronize_rcu(), synchronize_sched(), ... + * @sync: synchronize_rcu, synchronize_rcu_expedited, ... * * The list pointed to by @prev and @next can be RCU-read traversed * concurrently with this function. @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline void __list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * designed for stacks. * @list: the RCU-protected list to splice * @head: the place in the existing list to splice the first list into - * @sync: function to sync: synchronize_rcu(), synchronize_sched(), ... + * @sync: synchronize_rcu, synchronize_rcu_expedited, ... */ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, struct list_head *head, @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * list, designed for queues. * @list: the RCU-protected list to splice * @head: the place in the existing list to splice the first list into - * @sync: function to sync: synchronize_rcu(), synchronize_sched(), ... + * @sync: synchronize_rcu, synchronize_rcu_expedited, ... */ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, struct list_head *head, @@ -359,13 +359,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * @type: the type of the struct this is embedded in. * @member: the name of the list_head within the struct. * - * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu list-mutation - * primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some implicit RCU - * read-side guarding. One example is running within a special - * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where - * lockdep cannot be invoked (in which case updaters must use RCU-sched, - * as in synchronize_sched(), call_rcu_sched(), and friends). Another - * example is when items are added to the list, but never deleted. + * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu + * list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some + * implicit RCU read-side guarding. One example is running within a special + * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where lockdep + * cannot be invoked. Another example is when items are added to the list, + * but never deleted. */ #define list_entry_lockless(ptr, type, member) \ container_of((typeof(ptr))READ_ONCE(ptr), type, member) @@ -376,13 +375,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * @head: the head for your list. * @member: the name of the list_struct within the struct. * - * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu list-mutation - * primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some implicit RCU - * read-side guarding. One example is running within a special - * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where - * lockdep cannot be invoked (in which case updaters must use RCU-sched, - * as in synchronize_sched(), call_rcu_sched(), and friends). Another - * example is when items are added to the list, but never deleted. + * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu + * list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some + * implicit RCU read-side guarding. One example is running within a special + * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where lockdep + * cannot be invoked. Another example is when items are added to the list, + * but never deleted. */ #define list_for_each_entry_lockless(pos, head, member) \ for (pos = list_entry_lockless((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member); \ -- 2.17.1