From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/24] rcu: Inline _rcu_barrier() into its sole remaining caller
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:54:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829225405.7275-24-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829225340.GA7019@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Because rcu_barrier() is a one-line wrapper function for _rcu_barrier()
and because nothing else calls _rcu_barrier(), this commit inlines
_rcu_barrier() into rcu_barrier().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/trace/events/rcu.h | 20 ++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 4 +--
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index a8d07feff6a0..175e0bce22bd 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -705,20 +705,20 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_torture_read,
);
/*
- * Tracepoint for _rcu_barrier() execution. The string "s" describes
- * the _rcu_barrier phase:
- * "Begin": _rcu_barrier() started.
- * "EarlyExit": _rcu_barrier() piggybacked, thus early exit.
- * "Inc1": _rcu_barrier() piggyback check counter incremented.
- * "OfflineNoCB": _rcu_barrier() found callback on never-online CPU
- * "OnlineNoCB": _rcu_barrier() found online no-CBs CPU.
- * "OnlineQ": _rcu_barrier() found online CPU with callbacks.
- * "OnlineNQ": _rcu_barrier() found online CPU, no callbacks.
+ * Tracepoint for rcu_barrier() execution. The string "s" describes
+ * the rcu_barrier phase:
+ * "Begin": rcu_barrier() started.
+ * "EarlyExit": rcu_barrier() piggybacked, thus early exit.
+ * "Inc1": rcu_barrier() piggyback check counter incremented.
+ * "OfflineNoCB": rcu_barrier() found callback on never-online CPU
+ * "OnlineNoCB": rcu_barrier() found online no-CBs CPU.
+ * "OnlineQ": rcu_barrier() found online CPU with callbacks.
+ * "OnlineNQ": rcu_barrier() found online CPU, no callbacks.
* "IRQ": An rcu_barrier_callback() callback posted on remote CPU.
* "IRQNQ": An rcu_barrier_callback() callback found no callbacks.
* "CB": An rcu_barrier_callback() invoked a callback, not the last.
* "LastCB": An rcu_barrier_callback() invoked the last callback.
- * "Inc2": _rcu_barrier() piggyback check counter incremented.
+ * "Inc2": rcu_barrier() piggyback check counter incremented.
* The "cpu" argument is the CPU or -1 if meaningless, the "cnt" argument
* is the count of remaining callbacks, and "done" is the piggybacking count.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 5f2a12a65b42..31e94f672d01 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ static void rcu_leak_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
/*
* Helper function for call_rcu() and friends. The cpu argument will
* normally be -1, indicating "currently running CPU". It may specify
- * a CPU only if that CPU is a no-CBs CPU. Currently, only _rcu_barrier()
+ * a CPU only if that CPU is a no-CBs CPU. Currently, only rcu_barrier()
* is expected to specify a CPU.
*/
static void
@@ -2980,27 +2980,27 @@ static bool rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy)
}
/*
- * Helper function for _rcu_barrier() tracing. If tracing is disabled,
+ * Helper function for rcu_barrier() tracing. If tracing is disabled,
* the compiler is expected to optimize this away.
*/
-static void _rcu_barrier_trace(const char *s, int cpu, unsigned long done)
+static void rcu_barrier_trace(const char *s, int cpu, unsigned long done)
{
trace_rcu_barrier(rcu_state.name, s, cpu,
atomic_read(&rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count), done);
}
/*
- * RCU callback function for _rcu_barrier(). If we are last, wake
- * up the task executing _rcu_barrier().
+ * RCU callback function for rcu_barrier(). If we are last, wake
+ * up the task executing rcu_barrier().
*/
static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("LastCB"), -1,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("LastCB"), -1,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
complete(&rcu_state.barrier_completion);
} else {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("CB"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("CB"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
}
}
@@ -3011,33 +3011,40 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *unused)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("IRQ"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("IRQ"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
rdp->barrier_head.func = rcu_barrier_callback;
debug_rcu_head_queue(&rdp->barrier_head);
if (rcu_segcblist_entrain(&rdp->cblist, &rdp->barrier_head, 0)) {
atomic_inc(&rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count);
} else {
debug_rcu_head_unqueue(&rdp->barrier_head);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("IRQNQ"), -1,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("IRQNQ"), -1,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
}
}
-/* Orchestrate an RCU barrier, waiting for all RCU callbacks to complete. */
-static void _rcu_barrier(void)
+/**
+ * rcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu() callbacks complete.
+ *
+ * Note that this primitive does not necessarily wait for an RCU grace period
+ * to complete. For example, if there are no RCU callbacks queued anywhere
+ * in the system, then rcu_barrier() is within its rights to return
+ * immediately, without waiting for anything, much less an RCU grace period.
+ */
+void rcu_barrier(void)
{
int cpu;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Begin"), -1, s);
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Begin"), -1, s);
/* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */
mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
/* Did someone else do our work for us? */
if (rcu_seq_done(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence, s)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("EarlyExit"), -1,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("EarlyExit"), -1,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
@@ -3046,7 +3053,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(void)
/* Mark the start of the barrier operation. */
rcu_seq_start(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Inc1"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Inc1"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
/*
* Initialize the count to one rather than to zero in order to
@@ -3069,10 +3076,10 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(void)
rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
if (rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu)) {
if (!rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier(cpu)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OfflineNoCB"), cpu,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OfflineNoCB"), cpu,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
} else {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OnlineNoCB"), cpu,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OnlineNoCB"), cpu,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_inc(&rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count);
@@ -3080,11 +3087,11 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(void)
rcu_barrier_callback, cpu, 0);
}
} else if (rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OnlineQ"), cpu,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OnlineQ"), cpu,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, NULL, 1);
} else {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OnlineNQ"), cpu,
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("OnlineNQ"), cpu,
rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
}
}
@@ -3101,25 +3108,12 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(void)
wait_for_completion(&rcu_state.barrier_completion);
/* Mark the end of the barrier operation. */
- _rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Inc2"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
+ rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Inc2"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
rcu_seq_end(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
/* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
}
-
-/**
- * rcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight call_rcu() callbacks complete.
- *
- * Note that this primitive does not necessarily wait for an RCU grace period
- * to complete. For example, if there are no RCU callbacks queued anywhere
- * in the system, then rcu_barrier() is within its rights to return
- * immediately, without waiting for anything, much less an RCU grace period.
- */
-void rcu_barrier(void)
-{
- _rcu_barrier();
-}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 46452d3d0fad..8cf93ac277ec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
/* Grace period that needs help */
/* from cond_resched(). */
- /* 5) _rcu_barrier(), OOM callbacks, and expediting. */
+ /* 5) rcu_barrier(), OOM callbacks, and expediting. */
struct rcu_head barrier_head;
int exp_dynticks_snap; /* Double-check need for IPI. */
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
atomic_t barrier_cpu_count; /* # CPUs waiting on. */
struct completion barrier_completion; /* Wake at barrier end. */
unsigned long barrier_sequence; /* ++ at start and end of */
- /* _rcu_barrier(). */
+ /* rcu_barrier(). */
/* End of fields guarded by barrier_mutex. */
struct mutex exp_mutex; /* Serialize expedited GP. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 7add1c297500..beaaca7a11f4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier(int cpu)
* There needs to be a barrier before this function is called,
* but associated with a prior determination that no more
* callbacks would be posted. In the worst case, the first
- * barrier in _rcu_barrier() suffices (but the caller cannot
+ * barrier in rcu_barrier() suffices (but the caller cannot
* necessarily rely on this, not a substitute for the caller
* getting the concurrency design right!). There must also be
* a barrier between the following load an posting of a callback
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 22:53 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/24] Additional RCU-consolidation cleanups for v4.20/v5.0 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/24] rcu: Inline increment_cpu_stall_ticks() into its sole caller Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/24] rcu: Pull rcu_gp_kthread() FQS loop into separate function Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/24] rcu: Consolidate RCU-bh update-side function definitions Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/24] rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/24] rcutorture: Add RCU-bh and RCU-sched support for extended readers Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/24] rcu: Stop testing RCU-bh and RCU-sched Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/24] rcutorture: Remove the "rcu_bh" and "sched" torture types Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/24] rcuperf: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/24] rcu: Remove now-unused rcutorture APIs Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcupdate.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rculist.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcupdate_wait.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in Kconfig Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcu.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcutorture.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in srcutree.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tiny.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tree.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tree_exp.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in update.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/24] rcu: Remove !PREEMPT code from rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/24] rcu: Define rcu_all_qs() only in !PREEMPT builds Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829225405.7275-24-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).