linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmi tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:51:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904145152.5dae4343@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904091950.2e49b1a5@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:19:50 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the dmi tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/acpi/bus.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ae976358cd7b ("Revert "ACPI / bus: Parse tables as term_list for Dell XPS 9570 and Precision M5530"")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   767b174cad46 ("ACPI / bus: Only call dmi_check_system on X86")
> 
> from the dmi tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for the heads up. I have rebased my dmi tree on top of 4.19-rc2,
and this solves the conflict.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-04 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-03 23:19 linux-next: manual merge of the dmi tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-04 12:51 ` Jean Delvare [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180904145152.5dae4343@endymion \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).