From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07C8C43334 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCD220645 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:17:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6DCD220645 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727739AbeIDTmh (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:42:37 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:44551 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726015AbeIDTmh (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:42:37 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 59D3E208AF; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:17:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (242.171.71.37.rev.sfr.net [37.71.171.242]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3004C204AE; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:16:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:16:53 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: David Miller Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, quentin.schulz@bootlin.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, kishon@ti.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing configuration Message-ID: <20180904151653.GI13888@piout.net> References: <20180903093308.24366-1-quentin.schulz@bootlin.com> <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch> <20180903134522.GC13888@piout.net> <20180903.220910.899357653888940454.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180903.220910.899357653888940454.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/09/2018 22:09:10-0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexandre Belloni > Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200 > > > On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through > >> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem. > >> > >> Hi Quentin > >> > >> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets > >> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree. > >> > > > > There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably > > go through MIPS. > > No objection for this going through the MIPS tree, and from me: > What I meant was that 1/11 and 8/11 should go through MIPS because of the potential conflicts. The other patches can go through net-next as that will make more sense. Maybe Quentin can split the series in two, one for MIPS and one for net if that makes it easier for you to apply. > Acked-by: David S. Miller -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com