linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Bityutskiy, Artem" <artem.bityutskiy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86/intel_rdt: Do not display size for non-CAT resource
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:28:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180905062805.GA29120@chenyu-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cd8165b-c2e6-7ffc-1ef8-a7b497fab99e@intel.com>

Hi Reinette,
Thanks for looking at this.
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 03:36:01PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Chen Yu,
> 
> On 9/4/2018 1:24 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > On 9/4/2018 10:46 AM, Chen Yu wrote:
> >> On a platform with MB resource enabled, a divided-by-zero
> >> exception is triggered when accessing 'size':
> >>
> >> [  151.193447] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> >> [  151.197743] CPU: 93 PID: 1929 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.19.0-rc2-debug-rdt+ #25
> >> [  151.205070] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/0CRT1G, BIOS 1.3.7 02/08/2018
> >> [  151.212783] RIP: 0010:rdtgroup_cbm_to_size+0x7e/0xa0
> >> [  151.237172] RSP: 0018:ffffb3454f90bd88 EFLAGS: 00010246
> >> [  151.242538] RAX: 00000000023c0000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000003
> >> [  151.249878] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000003
> >> [  151.257213] RBP: ffff96ff0089e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000aaaaaa
> >> [  151.264544] R10: ffffb3454f90bd8c R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: ffffffffb5028910
> >> [  151.271887] R13: ffffffffb5028910 R14: 0000000000000064 R15: ffff96ff0089e000
> >> [  151.279217] FS:  00007f95a623a500(0000) GS:ffff97170f9c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> >> [  151.287532] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> >> [  151.293432] CR2: 00007f95a6217000 CR3: 00000023f696c003 CR4: 00000000007606e0
> >> [  151.300766] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> >> [  151.308094] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> >> [  151.315426] PKRU: 55555554
> >> [  151.318212] Call Trace:
> >> [  151.320732]  rdtgroup_size_show+0x11a/0x1d0
> >> [  151.325039]  seq_read+0xd8/0x3b0
> >> [  151.328363]  __vfs_read+0x36/0x170
> >> [  151.331857]  vfs_read+0x89/0x130
> >> [  151.335179]  ksys_read+0x52/0xc0
> >> [  151.338500]  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180
> >> [  151.342261]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> >>
> >> This is because for MB resource, the r->cache.cbm_len is zero, thus
> >> calculating size in rdtgroup_cbm_to_size() will trigger the exception.
> >>
> >> Fix this issue by not exposing 'size' for non-CAT resources.
> >>
> >> Fixes: d9b48c86eb38 ("x86/intel_rdt: Display resource groups'
> >> allocations in bytes")
> >> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> >> index b799c00bef09..53fd07b2f61a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> >> @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ static struct rftype res_common_files[] = {
> >>  		.mode		= 0444,
> >>  		.kf_ops		= &rdtgroup_kf_single_ops,
> >>  		.seq_show	= rdtgroup_size_show,
> >> -		.fflags		= RF_CTRL_BASE,
> >> +		.fflags		= RF_CTRL_INFO | RFTYPE_RES_CACHE,
> >>  	},
> >>  
> >>  };
> >>
> > 
> > Thank you very much for catching this.
> > 
> > I think we need to change the fix a bit because from that I can tell the
> > above would cause the "size" file to be relocated to the system wide
> > "info" directory 
Okay. Just curious, if changing like this, will it be moved to resctrl/info/L3/size or
resctrl/info/size?
>> while we would like to have this file remain associated
> > with the resource group - but just not apply to a MB resource.
> > 
> > A similar fix may also be needed for the resource group's "mode" file
> > that was also recently introduced.
> > 
> > I am taking a closer look now.
> 
> The "size" file is intended to be associated with a resource group and
> to list the size in bytes of the cache allocations. It does not
> currently accommodate the memory bandwidth allocations as you
> discovered. A system may have multiple resources to be managed via RDT,
> it could include cache as well as memory, and to thus not expose the
> "size" file if memory bandwidth allocation is supported is not ideal
> since the user would not be able to see this information for the cache
> resources.
> 
> So, instead of not exposing the "size" file when memory bandwidth
> allocation is in use I think that we could just include the memory
> bandwidth allocation information in the existing file. This would be in
> the currently active bandwidth granularity that would essentially
> duplicate the schemata information.
> 
I might understand incorrectly, but in this way, the size in resctrl top
dir will display all the domain ranges within all the resources, say, the
size for MB, L3 will be displayed in one file, right? Will the 'size' be
displayed under each resource dir in info dir?
> While looking further at how the new files (size and mode) will behave
> when a MBA resource is present I think I discovered a few more issues:
> - the "exclusive" mode should not apply to a MBA resource
> - it should not be possible to pseudo-lock a MBA resource
> 
> I attempt to address the above issues with the change below. Could you
> please try it out with what you are currently testing?
This patch works.
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> I do not have
> access to a system with a MBA resource - could you please let me know
> what system you are testing on so I can try out more tests?
> 
I'm using SKYLAKE-X, of cpu stepping 4, so l3cat might be disabled
due to errorta.

BTW, may I know the scope of CBM? It seems that in this patch all
the other resource than MBA could leverage CBM to calculate their
resource size. What if other resources are added in the future?

Best,
Yu
> Thanks!
> 
> Reinette
> 
> 
> -->8----
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> index af358ca05160..434dd93f915a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,12 @@ static int parse_line(char *line, struct
> rdt_resource *r,
>         struct rdt_domain *d;
>         unsigned long dom_id;
> 
> +       if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP &&
> +           r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> +               rdt_last_cmd_puts("Cannot pseudo-lock MBA resource\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
>  next:
>         if (!line || line[0] == '\0')
>                 return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> index b799c00bef09..2bc4a01536bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1027,6 +1027,8 @@ static bool rdtgroup_mode_test_exclusive(struct
> rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>         struct rdt_domain *d;
> 
>         for_each_alloc_enabled_rdt_resource(r) {
> +               if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA)
> +                       continue;
>                 list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
>                         if (rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps(r, d, d->ctrl_val[closid],
>                                                   rdtgrp->closid, false))
> @@ -1156,7 +1158,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_size_show(struct
> kernfs_open_file *of,
>         struct rdt_domain *d;
>         unsigned int size;
>         bool sep = false;
> -       u32 cbm;
> +       u32 ctrl;
> 
>         rdtgrp = rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn);
>         if (!rdtgrp) {
> @@ -1181,8 +1183,13 @@ static int rdtgroup_size_show(struct
> kernfs_open_file *of,
>                         if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) {
>                                 size = 0;
>                         } else {
> -                               cbm = d->ctrl_val[rdtgrp->closid];
> -                               size = rdtgroup_cbm_to_size(r, d, cbm);
> +                               ctrl = (!is_mba_sc(r) ?
> +
> d->ctrl_val[rdtgrp->closid] :
> +
> d->mbps_val[rdtgrp->closid]);
> +                               if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA)
> +                                       size = ctrl;
> +                               else
> +                                       size = rdtgroup_cbm_to_size(r,
> d, ctrl);
>                         }
>                         seq_printf(s, "%d=%u", d->id, size);
>                         sep = true;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-05  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 17:46 Chen Yu
2018-09-04 20:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-04 22:36   ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-05  6:28     ` Yu Chen [this message]
2018-09-05 20:52       ` Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 [PATCH V2 0/9] x86/intel_rdt: MBA integration fixes Fenghua Yu
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 1/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix data type in parsing callbacks Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:42   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Xiaochen Shen
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 2/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix size reporting of MBA resource Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 3/9] x86/intel_rdt: Global closid helper to support future fixes Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 4/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix invalid mode warning when multiple resources are managed Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:44   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 5/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix unchecked MSR access Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:45   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 6/9] x86/intel_rdt: Do not allow pseudo-locking of MBA resource Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:45   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 7/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix incorrect loop end condition Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:46   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 8/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix exclusive mode handling of MBA resource Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:46   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre
2018-09-15 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 9/9] x86/intel_rdt: Fix incorrect loop end condition Fenghua Yu
2018-09-18 21:47   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180905062805.GA29120@chenyu-desktop \
    --to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=artem.bityutskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86/intel_rdt: Do not display size for non-CAT resource' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).