From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56155C433F5 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE1620861 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amarulasolutions.com header.i=@amarulasolutions.com header.b="eaRE4f1l" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EBE1620861 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amarulasolutions.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727592AbeIETzP (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:55:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:36555 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726366AbeIETzP (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:55:15 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f4-v6so6410824edq.3 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amarulasolutions.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GMKU+EQ6NRL4FG/KWbBi5V5KZLsTBvKTdBtcZBX0qRQ=; b=eaRE4f1lHSCIKWkkN3WG1wXqPqr6A9L4rpRvdSbQvO8tTcEcp3+XbTFe+7OWqZDZiF y0ptAv28PJ62xc7XUEIQ49/GQ334rtn4NObLZkeawEtSPtxVmMg/3LUwVnmnMgp3B/8u tszG8Qs5Y8rN3ylH/HHwcm8nePPbUPQ5b0usw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GMKU+EQ6NRL4FG/KWbBi5V5KZLsTBvKTdBtcZBX0qRQ=; b=iQ8kaWifRFB9lTfw+dRfAn7uDWHXV5TkBUu2xe/pZGh159SpH+4SlYGW33cL2aYTF/ NETODl72B+VKoMrcMLS2Mhauy/Si5naT3u5RR7O3JvpgRfQpDwqAwCT6E/2h89119VO1 dDoYrZDnl5XYDg9cu9buWxp8Mx7Uow98CuiKxbX0CwsQMa0flFIrRJY71G5zJETw442g HcEvLwZwg1AZ09+AUNu1HOEgRCVtlGW2bWZbWgIa6w5ZNvdJk+iL5T4KAK6tL3dNgb/O lDyIlPorne8fP3Yv9qdS/x0+aGqrDuUvdZ42P3gSCOyZu11ONuHZuB7bsG1pD5R1xv9B MxAg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AFsoO5et7poa0X2tU+GSCDQU6FLKRkUddwI9guwx93ANvjvnKL 3/L0y3/nC1F5/GgIDJBeqhddGA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYx9xtJgxb7i8gHCOu7b4dh24w0ma+/GSUvJpICR0L/NSRuG5/HPsVKlaDv6IxRpoN1e9SV6w== X-Received: by 2002:a50:a7e2:: with SMTP id i89-v6mr42364739edc.176.1536161073548; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from andrea (85.100.broadband17.iol.cz. [109.80.100.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d56-v6sm1226501edb.7.2018.09.05.08.24.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:24:18 +0200 From: Andrea Parri To: Akira Yokosawa Cc: Alan Stern , Will Deacon , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC LKMM 1/7] tools/memory-model: Add extra ordering for locks and remove it for ordinary release/acquire Message-ID: <20180905152418.GA8874@andrea> References: <20180904081144.GA4137@andrea> <20180905072151.GA3185@andrea> <50f0a7a7-0521-f833-34c3-132ce57dd777@gmail.com> <20180905150042.GA8820@andrea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>>> Do you have any concrete suggestions (i.e., some actual text) for > >>>> improvements to the patch description? Earlier in your message you > >>>> mentioned that Will's comment: > >>>> > >>>> LKMM offers stronger guarantees that can portably be relied upon > >>>> in the codebase. > >>>> > >>>> would make a good addition. Suitably edited, it could be added to the > >>>> description. I can think of a few other things myself, but I'd like to > >>>> hear your thoughts. Anything else? > >>> > >>> Yes: I do sometimes have the impression that your "rules" for trimming > >>> text in emails/replies are too aggressive... > >> > >> Andrea, by saying "Yes:", do you mean you have something else to be added? > > > > Indeed (examples in the trimmed text). "examples" of "concrete suggestions" (pros or cons) to amend the log. > > So, you mean just amending commit log does not work for you? I can't really answer this...; let's see the revisited log first. Andrea > > > > > > >> I don't think you do, but want to make sure. > >> > >> I'm a bit surprised to see all you wanted was the amendment of the > >> commit log... > > > > Well, I said that it was my only current constructive argument... > > This thread is getting quite hard for me to follow... > > Akira > > > > > Andrea > > > > > >> > >> Akira > >> > >>> > >>> Andrea > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Alan > >>>> > >> >