From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1F7C43143 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5170020880 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5170020880 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=davemloft.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728239AbeIMXQU (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:16:20 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:51830 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726396AbeIMXQU (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 19:16:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [24.18.143.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2D8E13FE788C; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20180913.110544.1829014151772495898.davem@davemloft.net> To: mst@redhat.com Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20180913135833-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180912031709.14112-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20180913.092819.2099750169529223026.davem@davemloft.net> <20180913135833-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:02:13 -0400 > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:28:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jason Wang >> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:16:58 +0800 >> >> > This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket >> > through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: >> ... >> >> Series applied, thanks Jason. > > Going over it now I don't see a lot to complain about, but I'd > appreciate a bit more time for review in the future. 3 days ok? I try to handle every patchwork entry within 48 hours, more specifically 2 business days. Given the rate at which patches flow through networking, I think this is both reasonable and necessary. One always have the option to send a quick reply to the list saying "Please wait for my review, I'll get to it in the next day or two." which I will certainly honor. Thank you.