From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FEEECE560 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A2F214C2 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:37:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B7A2F214C2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729031AbeIQUFd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:05:33 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:55202 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728838AbeIQUEl (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:04:41 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1g1ue7-0008SJ-2Z; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:37:03 +0200 Message-Id: <20180917143545.830507216@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:29:08 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Bin Yang , Dave Hansen , Mark Gross Subject: [patch V3 02/11] x86/mm/cpa: Split, rename and clean up try_preserve_large_page() References: <20180917142906.384767038@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=x86-mm-cpa--Split-try_preserve_large_page--.patch Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Avoid the extra variable and gotos by splitting the function into the actual algorithm and a callable function which contains the lock protection. Rename it to should_split_large_page() while at it so the return values make actually sense. Clean up the code flow, comments and general whitespace damage while at it. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c @@ -421,18 +421,18 @@ pte_t *lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd_t *pgd, */ pte_t *lookup_address(unsigned long address, unsigned int *level) { - return lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd_offset_k(address), address, level); + return lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd_offset_k(address), address, level); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lookup_address); static pte_t *_lookup_address_cpa(struct cpa_data *cpa, unsigned long address, unsigned int *level) { - if (cpa->pgd) + if (cpa->pgd) return lookup_address_in_pgd(cpa->pgd + pgd_index(address), address, level); - return lookup_address(address, level); + return lookup_address(address, level); } /* @@ -549,27 +549,22 @@ static pgprot_t pgprot_clear_protnone_bi return prot; } -static int -try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, - struct cpa_data *cpa) +static int __should_split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, + struct cpa_data *cpa) { - unsigned long nextpage_addr, numpages, pmask, psize, addr, pfn, old_pfn; - pte_t new_pte, old_pte, *tmp; + unsigned long numpages, pmask, psize, lpaddr, addr, pfn, old_pfn; pgprot_t old_prot, new_prot, req_prot; - int i, do_split = 1; + pte_t new_pte, old_pte, *tmp; enum pg_level level; + int i; - if (cpa->force_split) - return 1; - - spin_lock(&pgd_lock); /* * Check for races, another CPU might have split this page * up already: */ tmp = _lookup_address_cpa(cpa, address, &level); if (tmp != kpte) - goto out_unlock; + return 1; switch (level) { case PG_LEVEL_2M: @@ -581,8 +576,7 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns old_pfn = pud_pfn(*(pud_t *)kpte); break; default: - do_split = -EINVAL; - goto out_unlock; + return -EINVAL; } psize = page_level_size(level); @@ -592,8 +586,8 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns * Calculate the number of pages, which fit into this large * page starting at address: */ - nextpage_addr = (address + psize) & pmask; - numpages = (nextpage_addr - address) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + lpaddr = (address + psize) & pmask; + numpages = (lpaddr - address) >> PAGE_SHIFT; if (numpages < cpa->numpages) cpa->numpages = numpages; @@ -620,57 +614,62 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns pgprot_val(req_prot) |= _PAGE_PSE; /* - * old_pfn points to the large page base pfn. So we need - * to add the offset of the virtual address: + * old_pfn points to the large page base pfn. So we need to add the + * offset of the virtual address: */ pfn = old_pfn + ((address & (psize - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT); cpa->pfn = pfn; - new_prot = static_protections(req_prot, address, pfn); + /* + * Calculate the large page base address and the number of 4K pages + * in the large page + */ + lpaddr = address & pmask; + numpages = psize >> PAGE_SHIFT; /* - * We need to check the full range, whether - * static_protection() requires a different pgprot for one of - * the pages in the range we try to preserve: + * Make sure that the requested pgprot does not violate the static + * protections. Check the full large page whether one of the pages + * in it results in a different pgprot than the first one of the + * requested range. If yes, then the page needs to be split. */ - addr = address & pmask; + new_prot = static_protections(req_prot, address, pfn); pfn = old_pfn; - for (i = 0; i < (psize >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pfn++) { + for (i = 0, addr = lpaddr; i < numpages; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pfn++) { pgprot_t chk_prot = static_protections(req_prot, addr, pfn); if (pgprot_val(chk_prot) != pgprot_val(new_prot)) - goto out_unlock; + return 1; } - /* - * If there are no changes, return. maxpages has been updated - * above: - */ - if (pgprot_val(new_prot) == pgprot_val(old_prot)) { - do_split = 0; - goto out_unlock; - } + /* If there are no changes, return. */ + if (pgprot_val(new_prot) == pgprot_val(old_prot)) + return 0; /* - * We need to change the attributes. Check, whether we can - * change the large page in one go. We request a split, when - * the address is not aligned and the number of pages is - * smaller than the number of pages in the large page. Note - * that we limited the number of possible pages already to - * the number of pages in the large page. + * Verify that the address is aligned and the number of pages + * covers the full page. */ - if (address == (address & pmask) && cpa->numpages == (psize >> PAGE_SHIFT)) { - /* - * The address is aligned and the number of pages - * covers the full page. - */ - new_pte = pfn_pte(old_pfn, new_prot); - __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, new_pte); - cpa->flags |= CPA_FLUSHTLB; - do_split = 0; - } + if (address != lpaddr || cpa->numpages != numpages) + return 1; + + /* All checks passed. Update the large page mapping. */ + new_pte = pfn_pte(old_pfn, new_prot); + __set_pmd_pte(kpte, address, new_pte); + cpa->flags |= CPA_FLUSHTLB; + return 0; +} -out_unlock: +static int should_split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, + struct cpa_data *cpa) +{ + int do_split; + + if (cpa->force_split) + return 1; + + spin_lock(&pgd_lock); + do_split = __should_split_large_page(kpte, address, cpa); spin_unlock(&pgd_lock); return do_split; @@ -1273,7 +1272,7 @@ static int __change_page_attr(struct cpa * Check, whether we can keep the large page intact * and just change the pte: */ - do_split = try_preserve_large_page(kpte, address, cpa); + do_split = should_split_large_page(kpte, address, cpa); /* * When the range fits into the existing large page, * return. cp->numpages and cpa->tlbflush have been updated in @@ -1288,23 +1287,23 @@ static int __change_page_attr(struct cpa err = split_large_page(cpa, kpte, address); if (!err) { /* - * Do a global flush tlb after splitting the large page - * and before we do the actual change page attribute in the PTE. - * - * With out this, we violate the TLB application note, that says - * "The TLBs may contain both ordinary and large-page + * Do a global flush tlb after splitting the large page + * and before we do the actual change page attribute in the PTE. + * + * With out this, we violate the TLB application note, that says + * "The TLBs may contain both ordinary and large-page * translations for a 4-KByte range of linear addresses. This * may occur if software modifies the paging structures so that * the page size used for the address range changes. If the two * translations differ with respect to page frame or attributes * (e.g., permissions), processor behavior is undefined and may * be implementation-specific." - * - * We do this global tlb flush inside the cpa_lock, so that we + * + * We do this global tlb flush inside the cpa_lock, so that we * don't allow any other cpu, with stale tlb entries change the * page attribute in parallel, that also falls into the * just split large page entry. - */ + */ flush_tlb_all(); goto repeat; }