From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A54ECE560 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F972146F for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:03:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 25F972146F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730582AbeIREcp (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:32:45 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48784 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730031AbeIREco (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:32:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (li1825-44.members.linode.com [172.104.248.44]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20937C77; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:03:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Yunlei He , Chao Yu , Jaegeuk Kim , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 068/126] f2fs: try grabbing node page lock aggressively in sync scenario Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:41:56 +0200 Message-Id: <20180917211708.756142136@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0 In-Reply-To: <20180917211703.481236999@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180917211703.481236999@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Chao Yu [ Upstream commit 4b270a8cc5047682f0a3f3f9af3b498408dbd2bc ] In synchronous scenario, like in checkpoint(), we are going to flush dirty node pages to device synchronously, we can easily failed writebacking node page due to trylock_page() failure, especially in condition of intensive lock competition, which can cause long latency of checkpoint(). So let's use lock_page() in synchronous scenario to avoid this issue. Signed-off-by: Yunlei He Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -1610,7 +1610,9 @@ next_step: !is_cold_node(page))) continue; lock_node: - if (!trylock_page(page)) + if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) + lock_page(page); + else if (!trylock_page(page)) continue; if (unlikely(page->mapping != NODE_MAPPING(sbi))) {