From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C57ECE566 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 22:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC558214C2 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 22:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WryRxOWp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AC558214C2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387516AbeITEar (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:30:47 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38990 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725755AbeITEaq (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:30:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 939B92083A; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 22:50:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1537397438; bh=aWD6+7zItbQVvMNaCgSZvwZhEdr4A8X9uBUJOsC+KlI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WryRxOWpya0LgpRME+TjYeJSkTH7e0ZcL1X5b++3SHRk9A79ApjlwWtyaLxZWw527 FtenF3ONAg7upoCMeI8W4Us+ugrJvo151pvCXkfGSvpuBsV3O/jZd9lAfkOW4AY5Jp zwsllh06LasYquEnP65oav2lGScQciA5fHnTgWnw= Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:50:37 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] f2fs: report ENOENT correct in f2fs_rename Message-ID: <20180919225037.GC79681@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20180918021805.85032-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180918021805.85032-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This fixes wrong error report in f2fs_rename. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- Change log from v1: - cover rename2 case fs/f2fs/namei.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c index 98d3ab7c3ce6..48f919469151 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c @@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, struct f2fs_dir_entry *old_entry; struct f2fs_dir_entry *new_entry; bool is_old_inline = f2fs_has_inline_dentry(old_dir); - int err = -ENOENT; + int err; if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) return -EIO; @@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, if (err) goto out; + err = -ENOENT; if (new_inode) { err = dquot_initialize(new_inode); if (err) @@ -1049,6 +1050,7 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, if (err) goto out; + err = -ENOENT; old_entry = f2fs_find_entry(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name, &old_page); if (!old_entry) { if (IS_ERR(old_page)) -- 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog