From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 13/26] s390: vfio-ap: zeroize the AP queues
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:36:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924133611.01fef50e.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1536781396-13601-14-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:43:03 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Let's call PAPQ(ZAPQ) to zeroize a queue for each queue configured
> for a mediated matrix device when it is released.
>
> Zeroizing a queue resets the queue, clears all pending
> messages for the queue entries and disables adapter interruptions
> associated with the queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index f8b276a..48b1b78 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,49 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(unsigned int apid, unsigned int apqi,
> + unsigned int retry)
> +{
> + struct ap_queue_status status;
> +
> + do {
> + status = ap_zapq(AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
> + switch (status.response_code) {
> + case AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL:
> + return 0;
> + case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS:
> + case AP_RESPONSE_BUSY:
> + msleep(20);
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* things are really broken, give up */
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + } while (retry--);
> +
> + return -EBUSY;
So, this function may either return 0, -EIO (things are really broken),
or -EBUSY (still busy after multiple tries)...
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int rc = 0;
> + unsigned long apid, apqi;
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
> +
> + for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm,
> + matrix_mdev->matrix.apm_max + 1) {
> + for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
> + matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max + 1) {
> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(apid, apqi, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + rc = ret;
...and here, we return the last error of any of the resets. Two
questions:
- Does it make sense to continue if we get -EIO? IOW, does "really
broken" only refer to a certain tuple and other tuples still can/need
to be reset?
- Is the return code useful in any way, as we don't know which tuple it
refers to?
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_ap_mdev_open(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
> @@ -859,6 +902,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_release(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> if (matrix_mdev->kvm)
> kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
>
> + vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(mdev);
> vfio_unregister_notifier(mdev_dev(mdev), VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY,
> &matrix_mdev->group_notifier);
> matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-24 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 19:42 [PATCH v10 00/26] guest dedicated crypto adapters Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 01/26] KVM: s390: vsie: simulate VCPU SIE entry/exit Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 10:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-09-24 16:53 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 02/26] KVM: s390: introduce and use KVM_REQ_VSIE_RESTART Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 10:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-09-24 16:48 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 03/26] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization Tony Krowiak
2018-09-21 23:18 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-24 10:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 04/26] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver Tony Krowiak
2018-09-20 15:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-20 15:53 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 05/26] s390: vfio-ap: register matrix device with VFIO mdev framework Tony Krowiak
2018-09-20 15:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-20 20:35 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 06/26] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure adapters Tony Krowiak
2018-09-21 9:40 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-21 9:52 ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-09-21 14:07 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 07/26] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure domains Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 10:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 08/26] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure control domains Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 10:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-12 19:42 ` [PATCH v10 09/26] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interface to view matrix mdev matrix Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 10:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 10/26] KVM: s390: interfaces to clear CRYCB masks Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 11:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-24 11:50 ` Halil Pasic
2018-09-24 12:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-24 15:33 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 14:49 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 11/26] s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback Tony Krowiak
2018-09-18 17:00 ` Halil Pasic
2018-09-18 21:57 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-21 23:28 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 8:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-24 16:07 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 18:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-24 18:43 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 19:46 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 19:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-25 19:54 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-25 19:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 12/26] s390: vfio-ap: implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO ioctl Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 11:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-24 16:29 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 13/26] s390: vfio-ap: zeroize the AP queues Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 11:36 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-09-24 12:16 ` Halil Pasic
2018-09-24 12:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-24 13:22 ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-09-24 16:42 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 14/26] s390: vfio-ap: implement VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 11:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 15/26] KVM: s390: Clear Crypto Control Block when using vSIE Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 16/26] KVM: s390: vsie: Do the CRYCB validation first Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 17/26] KVM: s390: vsie: Make use of CRYCB FORMAT2 clear Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 18/26] KVM: s390: vsie: Allow CRYCB FORMAT-2 Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 19/26] KVM: s390: vsie: allow CRYCB FORMAT-1 Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 20/26] KVM: s390: vsie: allow CRYCB FORMAT-0 Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 21/26] KVM: s390: vsie: allow guest FORMAT-0 CRYCB on host FORMAT-1 Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 22/26] KVM: s390: vsie: allow guest FORMAT-1 CRYCB on host FORMAT-2 Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 23/26] KVM: s390: vsie: allow guest FORMAT-0 " Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 24/26] KVM: s390: device attrs to enable/disable AP interpretation Tony Krowiak
2018-09-17 8:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-21 23:40 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-24 16:25 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 18:42 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 18:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-25 13:24 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-25 7:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-25 13:26 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 18:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-25 13:31 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 25/26] KVM: s390: CPU model support for AP virtualization Tony Krowiak
2018-09-21 23:31 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 8:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-12 19:43 ` [PATCH v10 26/26] s390: doc: detailed specifications " Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 10:10 ` [PATCH v10 00/26] guest dedicated crypto adapters Christian Borntraeger
2018-09-24 11:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-24 16:46 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 16:50 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-09-24 11:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-09-24 16:45 ` Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180924133611.01fef50e.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).