From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FBDC43382 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E66214AB for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:28:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 59E66214AB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729276AbeIYTf4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:35:56 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:45138 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727165AbeIYTfz (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:35:55 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id AF448807A8; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:28:20 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Christoph Conrads Cc: Edward Cree , Olof Johansson , Jonathan Corbet , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it. Message-ID: <20180925132820.GA22767@amd> References: <20180919081812.020f19e3@lwn.net> <72dadc76-44fe-ecb5-e142-0a9129082c93@cantab.net> <93b77a9a-12c3-6f7d-d2c3-0e0d7875a28b@cantab.net> <20180925112832.GA10951@amd> <20180925143645.af1457944142ecfec7199d80@christoph-conrads.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180925143645.af1457944142ecfec7199d80@christoph-conrads.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because= of > > > > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge= by > > > > code (or text) alone. > > > I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs > > > =A0and a Code to be run by humans.=A0 And when the author goes on a v= ictory > > > =A0lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document",= is > > > =A0it any surprise I'm worried? > >=20 > > Would you have link on that? >=20 > The CoC is a political document: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180924234027/https://twitter.com/coralinead= a/status/1041465346656530432 >=20 > Possible victory lap 1: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180921104730/https://twitter.com/coralinead= a/status/1041441155874009093 >=20 > Possible victory lap 2: > https://web.archive.org/web/20180920211406/https://twitter.com/coralinead= a/status/1042249983590838272 >=20 Thanks! I thought you was referring to this... http://archive.is/6nhps =2E.. which is somehow even more disturbing to me. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAluqN/QACgkQMOfwapXb+vKUogCfcmEPrDVV2sJyJzW7RhOSmTEM ocMAnRoLuoqlbFn9xs3/9aM1/HxH4lr/ =zNz4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--