From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E118C00449 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 06:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079E20878 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 06:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="0dMHCNAo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2079E20878 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726883AbeJCM7d (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:59:33 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58428 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726405AbeJCM7d (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:59:33 -0400 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-67-185-97-198.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.185.97.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6FED20684; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 06:12:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1538547159; bh=w6hPIk70WRfRNWpSRYI4OZ13rlUrV/5gPe/byZSVbJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=0dMHCNAoggqkO51psuavdLB/Aqa4BNhz0rXDUgsSzivLPEStbmn/nN7GXbkjrsDPR BwS7+jWbRlxh0p1RHB+hjDpHRkgjz4bvUID9w0H14LeN3e5wYdmeRetAlPep4E6Pal 5IvmEmQ/c+3m6oMi/IKAgeuRfO8Ug9SehJ5q6SVw= Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 23:12:37 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Andy Polyakov Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Samuel Neves , Andy Lutomirski , Jean-Philippe Aumasson , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/23] zinc: import Andy Polyakov's Poly1305 ARM and ARM64 implementations Message-ID: <20181003061236.GB745@sol.localdomain> References: <20180925145622.29959-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20180925145622.29959-12-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180925145622.29959-12-Jason@zx2c4.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:56:10PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > These NEON and non-NEON implementations come from Andy Polyakov's > implementation, and are included here in raw form without modification, > so that subsequent commits that fix these up for the kernel can see how > it has changed. This awkward commit splitting has been requested for the > ARM[64] implementations in particular. > > While this is CRYPTOGAMS code, the originating code for this happens to > be the same as OpenSSL's commit 5bb1cd2292b388263a0cc05392bb99141212aa53 Sorry to ruin the fun, but actually there are no Poly1305 implementations in CRYPTOGAMS (https://github.com/dot-asm/cryptogams). Nor are there any ChaCha20 implementations. Andy P., can you please add your Poly1305 and ChaCha20 implementations to the CRYPTOGAMS repository, so that they have a clear kernel-compatible license? It would be great if you'd include a kernel-compatible license directly in the versions in the OpenSSL tree too... Thanks! - Eric