From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148B6C64EB8 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF620652 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:58:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D7AF620652 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727666AbeJDWvz (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:51:55 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39376 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727369AbeJDWvz (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:51:55 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94356ED1; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com (e107981-ln.emea.arm.com [10.4.13.117]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE4493F774; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:57:55 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Ulf Hansson , Sudeep Holla , Mark Rutland , Daniel Lezcano , Linux PM , Tony Lindgren , Kevin Hilman , Lina Iyer , Rob Herring , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux ARM , linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) Message-ID: <20181004155755.GD5233@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20181003143824.13059-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <10136406.EY9A7BdqYq@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:32:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:04 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat > > > >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I > > > >> have a plan for how to move forward. > > > >> > > > >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided > > > >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete > > > >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes, > > > >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily. > > > >> > > > >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's > > > >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8. > > > > > > > > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I > > > > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that? > > > > > > Yes, please. > > > > > > > > > > > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the > > > > PSCI-related ones need ACKs. > > > > > > For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more. > > > > > > Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed. > > > > > > Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack > > > from Daniel) > > > > OK, thanks. > > > > Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3? > > I don't see any dependency there, so I'll queue up the 1-3 in > pm-domains and the 4-6 in pm-cpuidle. I do not see why we should merge patches 4-6 for v4.20; they add legacy (DT bindings and related parsing code) with no user in the kernel; we may still want to tweak them, in particular PSCI DT bindings. Likewise, it makes no sense to merge patches 7-8 without the rest of the PSCI patches. Why do not we target v4.20-rc1 for the whole series re-posting and we take it from there given that we are at -rc6 tail end ? Thanks, Lorenzo