From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] drbd: avoid clang warning about pointless switch statement
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:18:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181004191854.GD10984@soda.linbit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002171447.10765-1-natechancellor@gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:14:48AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The drbd code causes warnings that we cannot easily disable when building with clang:
>
> In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c:10:
> In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:48:
> In file included from include/linux/drbd_genl_api.h:53:
> In file included from include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:237:
> include/linux/drbd_genl.h:300:1: warning: no case matching constant switch condition '0'
>
> There is nothing wrong with the code, and adding 'default:' labels
> in the right place is enough to let clang shut up about the warning.
Actually, I think I'd prefer a "case 0:" instead of the "default:",
because that would assert that we don't use a 0 for op or field numbers.
As at least some people seem to care, I suggest we bundle up
this and the other clang warning you just resent the patch for
with whatever else we may come up with for the next merge window
and send a pull request to Jens then.
In case we forget, please send a friendly reminder.
Thanks,
Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-02 17:14 [PATCH RESEND] drbd: avoid clang warning about pointless switch statement Nathan Chancellor
2018-10-04 19:18 ` Lars Ellenberg [this message]
2018-10-04 19:22 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-10-04 20:09 ` [PATCH v2] drbd: Avoid Clang warning about pointless switch statment Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-17 17:24 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-17 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-18 9:22 ` Lars Ellenberg
2018-12-18 13:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181004191854.GD10984@soda.linbit \
--to=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).