From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE019C00449 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 06:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B26208E7 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 06:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Hm22OQup" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A6B26208E7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727765AbeJENWC (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:22:02 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:49418 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726732AbeJENWC (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:22:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gHx4I5G6OYgaLq7fY3AgsyjAUHUqHM53UCcMDPnHKZ4=; b=Hm22OQupRRlzYbQ0TMK2iJWwD cYxX/+B/9yJq23f3T3N+6B1op1/GnhGgYcQ4E8JZeP1AHQ9pMbk4ThZEYYe15o8/lXIPV/EkP8V6H uCxDxElCf1PZQySBf4ljrF7vrl5qchH3MGnLGq5SW++o8CskxmnmJOXCV8fHO8vTcnnwFFQM1yUch HumVnJ90guzsPy0hnnM3qET2mO1lH+3lcGAhAIIKm6EnBiADHJTAU8PFzRtcAUmjTsIHEtVuMU0gf VQXovRHIZE03iw+mkoKHo7ArPnnLmQTUU6JqDUvAStUsSaSpVbZhEE8i8TpHb17KheeJdB1+3mpB/ 4OxN77c7Q==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1g8JXY-0007wy-QL; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 06:24:44 +0000 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 23:24:44 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Damien Le Moal , Linus Walleij , Artem Bityutskiy , Paolo Valente , Jens Axboe , linux-block , linux-mmc , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Pavel Machek , Ulf Hansson , Richard Weinberger , Adrian Hunter , Jan Kara , "aherrmann@suse.com" , "mgorman@suse.com" , Chunyan Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com" , "oleksandr@natalenko.name" , Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices Message-ID: <20181005062444.GA30240@infradead.org> References: <20181002124329.21248-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <05fdbe23-ec01-895f-e67e-abff85c1ece2@kernel.dk> <1538550325.14984.108.camel@gmail.com> <20181003125146.GA9313@infradead.org> <1538578732.205649.0.camel@acm.org> <20181003150131.GA7306@infradead.org> <1538579724.205649.2.camel@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1538579724.205649.2.camel@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 08:15:24AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:01 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 07:58:52AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > Has the work with the T10 committee to standardize the SCSI equivalent of anonymous > > > writes already started? > > > > No, and I don't know of anyone who wants to do that in the short term. > > That's unfortunate. I think having such a command available in the SCSI > command set would be a step forward. I'm not saying it doesn't make sense, only that I don't know of any short term plans.