* [PATCH v4 1/5] remoteproc: Introduce custom dump function for each remoteproc segment
2018-10-09 16:23 [PATCH v4 0/5] Add coredump support for Q6v5 Modem remoteproc Sibi Sankar
@ 2018-10-09 16:23 ` Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] remoteproc: Add mechanism for custom dump function assignment Sibi Sankar
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sibi Sankar @ 2018-10-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bjorn.andersson, ohad
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, tsoni, sricharan,
akdwived, kyan, Sibi Sankar
Introduce custom dump function and private data per remoteproc dump
segment. The dump function is responsible for filling the device memory
segment associated with coredump
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 16 ++++++++++------
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index aa6206706fe3..afa4274b6ccd 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1183,14 +1183,18 @@ static void rproc_coredump(struct rproc *rproc)
phdr->p_flags = PF_R | PF_W | PF_X;
phdr->p_align = 0;
- ptr = rproc_da_to_va(rproc, segment->da, segment->size);
- if (!ptr) {
- dev_err(&rproc->dev,
+ if (segment->dump) {
+ segment->dump(rproc, segment, data + offset);
+ } else {
+ ptr = rproc_da_to_va(rproc, segment->da, segment->size);
+ if (!ptr) {
+ dev_err(&rproc->dev,
"invalid coredump segment (%pad, %zu)\n",
&segment->da, segment->size);
- memset(data + offset, 0xff, segment->size);
- } else {
- memcpy(data + offset, ptr, segment->size);
+ memset(data + offset, 0xff, segment->size);
+ } else {
+ memcpy(data + offset, ptr, segment->size);
+ }
}
offset += phdr->p_filesz;
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index e3c5d856b6da..2a93e102d2ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -399,6 +399,9 @@ enum rproc_crash_type {
* @node: list node related to the rproc segment list
* @da: device address of the segment
* @size: size of the segment
+ * @priv: private data associated with the dump_segment
+ * @dump: custom dump function to fill device memory segment associated
+ * with coredump
*/
struct rproc_dump_segment {
struct list_head node;
@@ -406,6 +409,9 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
dma_addr_t da;
size_t size;
+ void *priv;
+ void (*dump)(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_dump_segment *segment,
+ void *dest);
loff_t offset;
};
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/5] remoteproc: Add mechanism for custom dump function assignment
2018-10-09 16:23 [PATCH v4 0/5] Add coredump support for Q6v5 Modem remoteproc Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] remoteproc: Introduce custom dump function for each remoteproc segment Sibi Sankar
@ 2018-10-09 16:23 ` Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Refactor mba load/unload sequence Sibi Sankar
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sibi Sankar @ 2018-10-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bjorn.andersson, ohad
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, tsoni, sricharan,
akdwived, kyan, Sibi Sankar
This patch adds a mechanism for assigning each rproc dump segment with
a custom dump function and private data. The dump function is to be
called for each rproc segment during coredump if assigned.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 5 ++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index afa4274b6ccd..076579f44c3a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1121,6 +1121,45 @@ int rproc_coredump_add_segment(struct rproc *rproc, dma_addr_t da, size_t size)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_coredump_add_segment);
+/**
+ * rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment() - add segment of device memory to
+ * coredump and extend it with custom
+ * dump function
+ * @rproc: handle of a remote processor
+ * @da: device address
+ * @size: size of segment
+ * @priv: private data
+ * @dumpfn: custom dump function called for each segment during coredump
+ *
+ * Add device memory to the list of segments to be included in the coredump
+ * and associate the segment with the given custom dump function and private
+ * data.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
+ */
+int rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(struct rproc *rproc,
+ dma_addr_t da, size_t size, void *priv,
+ void (*dumpfn)(struct rproc *rproc,
+ struct rproc_dump_segment *segment,
+ void *dest))
+{
+ struct rproc_dump_segment *segment;
+
+ segment = kzalloc(sizeof(*segment), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!segment)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ segment->da = da;
+ segment->size = size;
+ segment->priv = priv;
+ segment->dump = dumpfn;
+
+ list_add_tail(&segment->node, &rproc->dump_segments);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment);
+
/**
* rproc_coredump() - perform coredump
* @rproc: rproc handle
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 2a93e102d2ad..0003b23ab117 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -563,6 +563,11 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc);
void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc);
void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type);
int rproc_coredump_add_segment(struct rproc *rproc, dma_addr_t da, size_t size);
+int rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(struct rproc *rproc,
+ dma_addr_t da, size_t size, void *priv,
+ void (*dumpfn)(struct rproc *rproc,
+ struct rproc_dump_segment *segment,
+ void *dest));
static inline struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/5] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Refactor mba load/unload sequence
2018-10-09 16:23 [PATCH v4 0/5] Add coredump support for Q6v5 Modem remoteproc Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] remoteproc: Introduce custom dump function for each remoteproc segment Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] remoteproc: Add mechanism for custom dump function assignment Sibi Sankar
@ 2018-10-09 16:23 ` Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Add custom dump function for modem Sibi Sankar
2018-10-09 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Register segments/dumpfn for coredump Sibi Sankar
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sibi Sankar @ 2018-10-09 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bjorn.andersson, ohad
Cc: linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, tsoni, sricharan,
akdwived, kyan, Sibi Sankar
Refactor re-useable parts of mba load/unload sequence into mba_load and
mba_reclaim respectively. This is done in order to prevent code duplication
for modem coredump, which requires the mba to be loaded before dumping
the segments. No change in functionality is intended.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 239 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index f52b64120877..c475af65ba1d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -679,6 +679,143 @@ static bool q6v5_phdr_valid(const struct elf32_phdr *phdr)
return true;
}
+static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
+{
+ int ret;
+ int xfermemop_ret;
+
+ ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
+ qproc->proxy_reg_count);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy supplies\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
+ qproc->proxy_clk_count);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy clocks\n");
+ goto disable_proxy_reg;
+ }
+
+ ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
+ qproc->active_reg_count);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable supplies\n");
+ goto disable_proxy_clk;
+ }
+
+ ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->reset_clks,
+ qproc->reset_clk_count);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable reset clocks\n");
+ goto disable_vdd;
+ }
+
+ ret = q6v5_reset_deassert(qproc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to deassert mss restart\n");
+ goto disable_reset_clks;
+ }
+
+ ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
+ qproc->active_clk_count);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable clocks\n");
+ goto assert_reset;
+ }
+
+ /* Assign MBA image access in DDR to q6 */
+ ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, true,
+ qproc->mba_phys, qproc->mba_size);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev,
+ "assigning Q6 access to mba memory failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto disable_active_clks;
+ }
+
+ writel(qproc->mba_phys, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_IMAGE_REG);
+
+ ret = q6v5proc_reset(qproc);
+ if (ret)
+ goto reclaim_mba;
+
+ ret = q6v5_rmb_mba_wait(qproc, 0, 5000);
+ if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "MBA boot timed out\n");
+ goto halt_axi_ports;
+ } else if (ret != RMB_MBA_XPU_UNLOCKED &&
+ ret != RMB_MBA_XPU_UNLOCKED_SCRIBBLED) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "MBA returned unexpected status %d\n", ret);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto halt_axi_ports;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+halt_axi_ports:
+ q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
+ q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
+ q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);
+
+reclaim_mba:
+ xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, false,
+ qproc->mba_phys,
+ qproc->mba_size);
+ if (xfermemop_ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev,
+ "Failed to reclaim mba buffer, system may become unstable\n");
+ }
+
+disable_active_clks:
+ q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
+ qproc->active_clk_count);
+assert_reset:
+ q6v5_reset_assert(qproc);
+disable_reset_clks:
+ q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->reset_clks,
+ qproc->reset_clk_count);
+disable_vdd:
+ q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
+ qproc->active_reg_count);
+disable_proxy_clk:
+ q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
+ qproc->proxy_clk_count);
+disable_proxy_reg:
+ q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
+ qproc->proxy_reg_count);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void q6v5_mba_reclaim(struct q6v5 *qproc)
+{
+ int xfermemop_ret;
+
+ q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
+ q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
+ q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);
+ xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, false,
+ qproc->mba_phys,
+ qproc->mba_size);
+ if (xfermemop_ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev,
+ "Failed to reclaim mba buffer, system may become unstable\n");
+ }
+
+ q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
+ qproc->active_clk_count);
+ q6v5_reset_assert(qproc);
+ q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->reset_clks,
+ qproc->reset_clk_count);
+ q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
+ qproc->active_reg_count);
+ q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
+ qproc->proxy_clk_count);
+ q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
+ qproc->proxy_reg_count);
+}
+
static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
{
const struct elf32_phdr *phdrs;
@@ -803,72 +940,9 @@ static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
qcom_q6v5_prepare(&qproc->q6v5);
- ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
- qproc->proxy_reg_count);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy supplies\n");
- goto disable_irqs;
- }
-
- ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
- qproc->proxy_clk_count);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy clocks\n");
- goto disable_proxy_reg;
- }
-
- ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
- qproc->active_reg_count);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable supplies\n");
- goto disable_proxy_clk;
- }
-
- ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->reset_clks,
- qproc->reset_clk_count);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable reset clocks\n");
- goto disable_vdd;
- }
-
- ret = q6v5_reset_deassert(qproc);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to deassert mss restart\n");
- goto disable_reset_clks;
- }
-
- ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
- qproc->active_clk_count);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable clocks\n");
- goto assert_reset;
- }
-
- /* Assign MBA image access in DDR to q6 */
- ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, true,
- qproc->mba_phys, qproc->mba_size);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev,
- "assigning Q6 access to mba memory failed: %d\n", ret);
- goto disable_active_clks;
- }
-
- writel(qproc->mba_phys, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_IMAGE_REG);
-
- ret = q6v5proc_reset(qproc);
+ ret = q6v5_mba_load(qproc);
if (ret)
- goto reclaim_mba;
-
- ret = q6v5_rmb_mba_wait(qproc, 0, 5000);
- if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "MBA boot timed out\n");
- goto halt_axi_ports;
- } else if (ret != RMB_MBA_XPU_UNLOCKED &&
- ret != RMB_MBA_XPU_UNLOCKED_SCRIBBLED) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev, "MBA returned unexpected status %d\n", ret);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto halt_axi_ports;
- }
+ goto disable_irqs;
dev_info(qproc->dev, "MBA booted, loading mpss\n");
@@ -897,40 +971,7 @@ static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
false, qproc->mpss_phys,
qproc->mpss_size);
WARN_ON(xfermemop_ret);
-
-halt_axi_ports:
- q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
- q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
- q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);
-
-reclaim_mba:
- xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm, false,
- qproc->mba_phys,
- qproc->mba_size);
- if (xfermemop_ret) {
- dev_err(qproc->dev,
- "Failed to reclaim mba buffer, system may become unstable\n");
- }
-
-disable_active_clks:
- q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->active_clks,
- qproc->active_clk_count);
-
-assert_reset:
- q6v5_reset_assert(qproc);
-disable_reset_clks:
- q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->reset_clks,
- qproc->reset_clk_count);
-disable_vdd:
- q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->active_regs,
- qproc->active_reg_count);
-disable_proxy_clk:
- q6v5_clk_disable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
- qproc->proxy_clk_count);
-disable_proxy_reg:
- q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
- qproc->proxy_reg_count);
-
+ q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc);
disable_irqs:
qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&qproc->q6v5);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread