From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FADECDE3A for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8B9214C4 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:56:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA8B9214C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=joshtriplett.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726969AbeJJCO5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:14:57 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:42887 "EHLO relay10.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726476AbeJJCO5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:14:57 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 86220 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:14:56 EDT Received: from localhost (jfdmzpr03-ext.jf.intel.com [134.134.139.72]) (Authenticated sender: josh@joshtriplett.org) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA6AA240007; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 18:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:56:23 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Rainer Fiebig Cc: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses Message-ID: <20181009185622.GA20960@localhost> References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20181008152043.GA5796@localhost> <1718828.OxLgMoHbrt@siriux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1718828.OxLgMoHbrt@siriux> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:29:24PM +0200, Rainer Fiebig wrote: > Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2018, 08:20:44 schrieb Josh Triplett: > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 02:36:39PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > > > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > > > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch > > > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by > > > the project to correct this ambiguity. > > > > Upstream has now adopted a FAQ, which addresses this and many other > > questions. See https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq . > > > > Might I suggest adding that link to the bottom of the document, instead? > > (And then, optionally, submitting entries for that FAQ.) > > > > The Code of Conflict has 28 lines, including the heading. > The Code of Conduct has 81 lines, including the heading. And it needs a FAQ. Hm. Yes, it turns out to be a more complicated problem than it was previously oversimplified to. People don't automatically share a common understanding.