From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: convert kasan/quarantine_lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:53:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181010095343.6qxved3owi6yokoa@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+agGPSTZ-8A8r8haSeRM8UpRYMAF8BC4A87yeM9nvpP6w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2018-10-10 11:45:32 [+0200], Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > Should I repost Clark's patch?
>
>
> I am much more comfortable with just changing the type of the lock.
Yes, that is what Clark's patch does. Should I resent it?
> What are the bad implications of using the raw spinlock? Will it help
> to do something along the following lines:
>
> // Because of ...
> #if CONFIG_RT
> #define quarantine_spinlock_t raw_spinlock_t
> #else
> #define quarantine_spinlock_t spinlock_t
> #endif
no. For !RT spinlock_t and raw_spinlock_t are the same. For RT
spinlock_t does not disable interrupts or preemption while
raw_spinlock_t does.
Therefore holding a raw_spinlock_t might increase your latency.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-10 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 15:29 [PATCH RT] rt: convert mm/kasan/quarantine_lock to raw_spinlock Clark Williams
2018-09-18 20:34 ` kbuild test robot
2018-10-05 16:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-18 9:04 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2018-10-05 16:30 ` [PATCH] kasan: convert kasan/quarantine_lock " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-05 16:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-08 0:47 ` Clark Williams
2018-10-08 9:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-09 14:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-10 8:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 9:29 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-10 9:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 9:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2018-10-10 9:57 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-10 21:49 ` [PATCH] mm/kasan: make quarantine_lock a raw_spinlock_t Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-10-11 8:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-10-12 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-13 13:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-15 23:35 ` Andrew Morton
2018-10-19 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181010095343.6qxved3owi6yokoa@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).