From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51260C43441 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5E32086D for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:36:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A5E32086D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726693AbeJJX7C (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:59:02 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:56690 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726479AbeJJX7C (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:59:02 -0400 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id 45188809CD; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:36:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:36:03 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Dave Airlie Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit , LKML Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses Message-ID: <20181010163603.GA22306@amd> References: <1538861738.4088.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley > > --- > > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/= process/code-of-conduct.rst > > index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants inc= lude: > > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political a= ttacks > > * Public or private harassment > > * Publishing others=E2=80=99 private information, such as a physical o= r electronic > > - address, without explicit permission > > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit pe= rmission > > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > > professional setting > > >=20 > I agree we want something like this, the question is whether we want > to change the CoC text from upstream, or clarify it in a separate > section. If this comes from some kind of "upstream", that should be clearly marked so in the document or at least in the git log. I was always wondering who created that "useful document". Pavel (And would still like to know what the background story is.) =09 --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlu+KnMACgkQMOfwapXb+vLCSgCeLER77yWcAxUsoiaQ78cA29ZQ J/wAoKhjbDoXy8oP2yAPC1FJGMUmK4ek =RW8M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--