From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, keescook@chromium.org, msys.mizuma@gmail.com,
indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit kaslr to choosing the immovable memory
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:21:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018042123.GD1885@192.168.1.4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181017102012.872-9-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 10/17/18 at 06:20pm, Chao Fan wrote:
> If CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE enabled and the amount of immovable
> memory regions is not zero. Calculate the intersection between memory
This if conditional adverbial clauses is not an complete sentence.
> regions from e820/efi memory table and immovable memory regions.
^ get?
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 0c3567bc231c..3ebb150f61eb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ static bool memmap_too_large;
> /* Store memory limit specified by "mem=nn[KMG]" or "memmap=nn[KMG]" */
> static unsigned long long mem_limit = ULLONG_MAX;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +/* Store the immovable memory regions */
> +extern struct mem_vector immovable_mem[MAX_NUMNODES*2];
Sorry, Chao. I may not follow your old patch change, why the length of
immovable_mem is MAX_NUMNODES*2, is there any reason or basis?
> +#endif
> +
>
> enum mem_avoid_index {
> MEM_AVOID_ZO_RANGE = 0,
> @@ -577,9 +582,9 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
> - unsigned long minimum,
> - unsigned long image_size)
> +static void slots_count(struct mem_vector *entry,
> + unsigned long minimum,
> + unsigned long image_size)
> {
> struct mem_vector region, overlap;
> unsigned long start_orig, end;
> @@ -655,6 +660,57 @@ static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
> + unsigned long long minimum,
> + unsigned long long image_size)
> +{
> + int i;
> + /*
> + * If no immovable memory found, or MEMORY_HOTREMOVE disabled,
> + * walk all the regions, so use region directely.
> + */
> + if (num_immovable_mem == 0) {
> + slots_count(region, minimum, image_size);
> +
> + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> + debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> + /*
> + * If immovable memory found, filter the intersection between
> + * immovable memory and region to slots_count.
> + * Otherwise, go on old code.
Could you explain more about what is the old code in otherwise case you
want to go on?
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < num_immovable_mem; i++) {
> + struct mem_vector entry;
> + unsigned long long start, end, entry_end, region_end;
> +
> + if (!mem_overlaps(region, &immovable_mem[i]))
> + continue;
> +
> + start = immovable_mem[i].start;
> + end = start + immovable_mem[i].size;
> + region_end = region->start + region->size;
> +
> + entry.start = clamp(region->start, start, end);
> + entry_end = clamp(region_end, start, end);
> + entry.size = entry_end - entry.start;
> +
> + slots_count(&entry, minimum, image_size);
Obviously, your patch log only covers this place of code. About renaming
process_mem_region() to slot_count(), and add another level of wrapper
process_mem_region(), may also need be mentioned in patch log.
> +
> + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> + debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> /*
> * Returns true if mirror region found (and must have been processed
> @@ -720,11 +776,8 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>
> region.start = md->phys_addr;
> region.size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
> - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> - debug_putstr("Aborted EFI scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> + if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
> break;
> - }
> }
> return true;
> }
> @@ -751,11 +804,8 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum,
> continue;
> region.start = entry->addr;
> region.size = entry->size;
> - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
> - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> - debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> + if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
> break;
> - }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.2
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-17 10:20 [PATCH v9 0/8] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] x86/boot: Introduce cmdline_find_option_arg()to detect if option=arg in cmdline Chao Fan
2018-10-18 4:01 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-18 6:15 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] x86/boot: Copy kstrtoull() to compressed period Chao Fan
2018-10-18 4:03 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-18 5:51 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-18 6:01 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-18 6:08 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] x86/boot: Add efi_get_rsdp_addr() to dig out RSDP from EFI table Chao Fan
2018-10-18 4:35 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-18 5:54 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-18 5:56 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-18 6:10 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] x86/boot: Add bios_get_rsdp_addr() to search RSDP in memory Chao Fan
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] x86/boot: Add get_acpi_rsdp() to parse RSDP in cmdlien from kexec Chao Fan
2018-10-21 2:26 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-22 5:30 ` Fan, Chao
2018-10-22 6:06 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-22 7:30 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-22 7:36 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-10-18 6:12 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-21 2:34 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-22 5:29 ` Fan, Chao
2018-10-22 6:08 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter " Chao Fan
2018-10-18 4:23 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-18 5:56 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-17 10:20 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit kaslr to choosing the " Chao Fan
2018-10-18 4:21 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2018-10-22 10:13 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-22 10:24 ` Baoquan He
2018-10-22 10:49 ` Chao Fan
2018-10-18 3:59 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in " Baoquan He
2018-10-18 5:48 ` Chao Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018042123.GD1885@192.168.1.4 \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).