From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=9pGL=NC=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD80C67863
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:01:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120DA20651
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:01:53 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 120DA20651
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728602AbeJWBVJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:21:09 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34378 "EHLO mx1.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1728489AbeJWBVI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:21:08 -0400
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])
        by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7593AEE7;
        Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:01:46 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Cc:     Spock <dairinin@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Memory management issue in 4.18.15
Message-ID: <20181022170146.GI18839@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <CADa=ObrwYaoNFn0x06mvv5W1F9oVccT5qjGM8qFBGNPoNuMUNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181022083322.GE32333@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20181022150815.GA4287@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181022150815.GA4287@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon 22-10-18 15:08:22, Roman Gushchin wrote:
[...]
> RE backporting: I'm slightly surprised that only one patch of the memcg
> reclaim fix series has been backported. Either all or none makes much more
> sense to me.

Yeah, I think this is AUTOSEL trying to be clever again. I though it has
been agreed that MM is quite good at marking patches for stable and so
it was not considered by the machinery. Sasha?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs