From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@google.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org Cc: joel@jms.id.au, mpe@ellerman.id.au, joe@perches.com, brakmo@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, khilman@baylibre.com, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robh@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Subject: [RFC v2 05/14] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:57:41 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181023235750.103146-6-brendanhiggins@google.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20181023235750.103146-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and then verified in tests. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> --- include/kunit/test.h | 259 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 68320fa2452de..d652825d7296f 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -273,4 +273,263 @@ void __printf(3, 4) test_printk(const char *level, #define test_err(test, fmt, ...) \ test_printk(KERN_ERR, test, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) +static inline struct test_stream *test_expect_start(struct test *test, + const char *file, + const char *line) +{ + struct test_stream *stream = test_new_stream(test); + + stream->add(stream, "EXPECTATION FAILED at %s:%s\n\t", file, line); + + return stream; +} + +static inline void test_expect_end(struct test *test, + bool success, + struct test_stream *stream) +{ + if (!success) + test->fail(test, stream); + else + stream->clear(stream); +} + +#define TEST_EXPECT_START(test) \ + test_expect_start(test, __FILE__, __stringify(__LINE__)) + +#define TEST_EXPECT_END(test, success, stream) \ + test_expect_end(test, success, stream) + +#define TEST_EXPECT(test, success, message) do { \ + struct test_stream *__stream = TEST_EXPECT_START(test); \ + \ + __stream->add(__stream, message); \ + TEST_EXPECT_END(test, success, __stream); \ +} while (0) + +/** + * TEST_SUCCEED() - A no-op expectation. Only exists for code clarity. + * @test: The test context object. + * + * The opposite of TEST_FAIL(), it is an expectation that cannot fail. In other + * words, it does nothing and only exists for code clarity. See + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more information. + */ +#define TEST_SUCCEED(test) do {} while (0) + +/** + * TEST_FAIL() - Always causes a test to fail when evaluated. + * @test: The test context object. + * @message: an informational message to be printed when the assertion is made. + * + * The opposite of TEST_SUCCEED(), it is an expectation that always fails. In + * other words, it always results in a failed expectation, and consequently + * always causes the test case to fail when evaluated. See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() + * for more information. + */ +#define TEST_FAIL(test, message) TEST_EXPECT(test, false, message) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() - Causes a test failure when the expression is not true. + * @test: The test context object. + * @condition: an arbitrary boolean expression. The test fails when this does + * not evaluate to true. + * + * This and expectations of the form `TEST_EXPECT_*` will cause the test case to + * fail when the specified condition is not met; however, it will not prevent + * the test case from continuing to run; this is otherwise known as an + * *expectation failure*. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(test, condition) \ + TEST_EXPECT(test, (condition), \ + "Expected " #condition " is true, but is false.") + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_FALSE() - Causes a test failure when the expression is not false. + * @test: The test context object. + * @condition: an arbitrary boolean expression. The test fails when this does + * not evaluate to false. + * + * Sets an expectation that @condition evaluates to false. See + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_FALSE(test, condition) \ + TEST_EXPECT(test, !(condition), \ + "Expected " #condition " is false, but is true.") + +static inline void test_expect_binary(struct test *test, + long long left, const char *left_name, + long long right, const char *right_name, + bool compare_result, + const char *compare_name, + const char *file, + const char *line) +{ + struct test_stream *stream = test_expect_start(test, file, line); + + stream->add(stream, + "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", + left_name, compare_name, right_name); + stream->add(stream, "\t\t%s == %lld\n", left_name, left); + stream->add(stream, "\t\t%s == %lld", right_name, right); + + test_expect_end(test, compare_result, stream); +} + +/* + * A factory macro for defining the expectations for the basic comparisons + * defined for the built in types. + * + * Unfortunately, there is no common type that all types can be promoted to for + * which all the binary operators behave the same way as for the actual types + * (for example, there is no type that long long and unsigned long long can + * both be cast to where the comparison result is preserved for all values). So + * the best we can do is do the comparison in the original types and then coerce + * everything to long long for printing; this way, the comparison behaves + * correctly and the printed out value usually makes sense without + * interpretation, but can always be interpretted to figure out the actual + * value. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, condition, right) do { \ + typeof(left) __left = (left); \ + typeof(right) __right = (right); \ + test_expect_binary(test, \ + (long long) __left, #left, \ + (long long) __right, #right, \ + __left condition __right, #condition, \ + __FILE__, __stringify(__LINE__)); \ +} while (0) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_EQ() - Sets an expectation that @left and @right are equal. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * + * Sets an expectation that the values that @left and @right evaluate to are + * equal. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, (@left) == (@right)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more + * information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_EQ(test, left, right) \ + TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, ==, right) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_NE() - An expectation that @left and @right are not equal. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * + * Sets an expectation that the values that @left and @right evaluate to are not + * equal. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, (@left) != (@right)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more + * information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_NE(test, left, right) \ + TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, !=, right) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_LT() - An expectation that @left is less than @right. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * + * Sets an expectation that the value that @left evaluates to is less than the + * value that @right evaluates to. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, (@left) < (@right)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more + * information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_LT(test, left, right) \ + TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, <, right) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_LE() - An expectation that @left is less than or equal to @right. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * + * Sets an expectation that the value that @left evaluates to is less than or + * equal to the value that @right evaluates to. Semantically this is equivalent + * to TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, (@left) <= (@right)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for + * more information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_LE(test, left, right) \ + TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, <=, right) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_GT() - An expectation that @left is greater than @right. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * + * Sets an expectation that the value that @left evaluates to is greater than + * the value that @right evaluates to. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, (@left) > (@right)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more + * information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_GT(test, left, right) \ + TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, >, right) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_GE() - Expects that @left is greater than or equal to @right. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a primitive C type. + * + * Sets an expectation that the value that @left evaluates to is greater than + * the value that @right evaluates to. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, (@left) >= (@right)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for more + * information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_GE(test, left, right) \ + TEST_EXPECT_BINARY(test, left, >=, right) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_STREQ() - An expectation that strings @left and @right are equal. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a null terminated string. + * @right: an arbitrary expression that evaluates to a null terminated string. + * + * Sets an expectation that the values that @left and @right evaluate to are + * equal. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, !strcmp((@left), (@right))). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() + * for more information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_STREQ(test, left, right) do { \ + struct test_stream *__stream = TEST_EXPECT_START(test); \ + typeof(left) __left = (left); \ + typeof(right) __right = (right); \ + \ + __stream->add(__stream, "Expected " #left " == " #right ", but\n"); \ + __stream->add(__stream, "\t\t%s == %s\n", #left, __left); \ + __stream->add(__stream, "\t\t%s == %s\n", #right, __right); \ + \ + TEST_EXPECT_END(test, !strcmp(left, right), __stream); \ +} while (0) + +/** + * TEST_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() - Expects that @ptr is not null and not err. + * @test: The test context object. + * @ptr: an arbitrary pointer. + * + * Sets an expectation that the value that @ptr evaluates to is not null and not + * an errno stored in a pointer. This is semantically equivalent to + * TEST_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(@ptr)). See TEST_EXPECT_TRUE() for + * more information. + */ +#define TEST_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr) do { \ + struct test_stream *__stream = TEST_EXPECT_START(test); \ + typeof(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \ + \ + if (!__ptr) \ + __stream->add(__stream, \ + "Expected " #ptr " is not null, but is."); \ + if (IS_ERR(__ptr)) \ + __stream->add(__stream, \ + "Expected " #ptr " is not error, but is: %ld", \ + PTR_ERR(__ptr)); \ + \ + TEST_EXPECT_END(test, !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr), __stream); \ +} while (0) + #endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */ -- 2.19.1.568.g152ad8e336-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 2:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-23 23:57 [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 01/14] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core Brendan Higgins 2018-11-02 18:44 ` Shuah Khan 2018-11-07 1:28 ` Brendan Higgins 2018-11-07 20:02 ` Shuah Khan 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 02/14] kunit: test: add test resource management API Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 03/14] kunit: test: add string_stream a std::stream like string builder Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 04/14] kunit: test: add test_stream a std::stream like logger Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` Brendan Higgins [this message] 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 06/14] arch: um: enable running kunit from User Mode Linux Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 07/14] kunit: test: add initial tests Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 08/14] arch: um: add shim to trap to allow installing a fault catcher for tests Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 09/14] kunit: test: add the concept of assertions Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 10/14] kunit: add Python libraries for handing KUnit config and kernel Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 11/14] kunit: add KUnit wrapper script and simple output parser Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 12/14] kunit.py: improve output from python wrapper Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 13/14] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit Brendan Higgins 2018-10-23 23:57 ` [RFC v2 14/14] MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework Brendan Higgins 2018-10-24 9:14 ` [RFC v2 00/14] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel " Daniel Vetter 2018-10-25 21:25 ` Brendan Higgins 2018-10-25 17:40 ` Shuah Khan 2018-11-02 18:23 ` Shuah Khan 2018-11-07 1:17 ` Brendan Higgins 2018-11-07 17:46 ` Frank Rowand 2018-11-13 10:10 ` Brendan Higgins 2018-11-24 5:15 ` Knut Omang 2018-11-27 1:41 ` Brendan Higgins 2018-11-28 19:54 ` Knut Omang 2018-11-28 20:50 ` shuah 2018-11-30 0:59 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181023235750.103146-6-brendanhiggins@google.com \ --to=brendanhiggins@google.com \ --cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \ --cc=brakmo@fb.com \ --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \ --cc=joe@perches.com \ --cc=joel@jms.id.au \ --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \ --cc=keescook@google.com \ --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \ --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \ --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \ --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=richard@nod.at \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [RFC v2 05/14] kunit: test: add the concept of expectations' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).