From: thesven73@gmail.com
To: svendev@arcx.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, denis@eukrea.com,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC v1 0/1] imx-drm: match ipu_di_signal_cfg's clk_pol with its observed behaviour.
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:17:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181025161711.13727-1-TheSven73@googlemail.com> (raw)
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@arcx.com>
Request For Comments
We believe that the ipuv3 DI's pixel clock polarity is possibly being
misconfigured by the imx-drm driver.
We used an oscilloscope the observe the actual behaviour on our hardware,
and it is the opposite of what the driver is supposed to configure.
Some confusion could arise because the Freescale documentation does not
speak about data stable on rising or falling edge, but only of clock active
high / active low:
i.MX 6Dual/6Quad Applications Processor Reference Manual, Rev. 3, 07/2015,
page 3298)
bit 17 DI0 Output Clock's polarity
This bits define the polarity of the DI0's clock.
1 The output clock is active high
0 The output clock is active low
However, the supposedly wrong behaviour has been in place since April 2014,
and no-one has complained so far.
See commit 85de9d17c485c4196f74d45de2206d4802f8a3be
What are we missing ?
Sven Van Asbroeck (1):
imx-drm: match ipu_di_signal_cfg's clk_pol with its observed
behaviour.
drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-di.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-25 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-25 16:17 thesven73 [this message]
2018-10-25 16:17 ` [RFC v1 1/1] imx-drm: match ipu_di_signal_cfg's clk_pol with its observed behaviour thesven73
2018-10-25 16:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-25 18:15 [RFC v1 0/1] " thesven73
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181025161711.13727-1-TheSven73@googlemail.com \
--to=thesven73@gmail.com \
--cc=denis@eukrea.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=svendev@arcx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).