From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA22DC46475 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 19:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA302082E for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 19:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6FA302082E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727530AbeJZEXr (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:23:47 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:41943 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725784AbeJZEXq (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:23:46 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id i10-v6so4940047oik.8; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:49:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TZnCYIYXecA+M31SddVtNLY3eBwIyIKVXHve2FgLeRY=; b=nv6XNwMcpUCRQO5A43c4frt+W6GuESUatqYBPyIcSsbsn9cVT155qFTI5eA8NnAGlj pwHORxmQ2btMe0PRM3BxsPmCAqLxL5hluOFJADb8rKm80om5gJZLqRXKCyl8qkEMi2UO zo6KO4sKtF0FZux1bMKLzvFc4nmt5BIzheXYoLWzA/yFpVBpGbCi2upD9nYQakIjxSVt cOq/f+/5h1mmiF45Z6mkhYeYb6I9nsFmmcldfxtD6vtdX56Vnxxd4uOwn3wVqvgC1l8C w73OUFm3xeU+VFHk+NW29t4UBJ4rzoCVXnRjOsG0oS8ZZl0MphxqspElNLyliJ0dDd6S OJ5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gK2NZA+1zFFIZdKZCOYnm8Hd+MZvZ+VBjiKuVZV/5kiK5FZzu+M 76NIclws1uVnnpH7MOfHnQT3ieE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cc4Qq99ISXeinh7oQpV+rxSdvmkSlr5FVvfBHzo6QmspVs7X/E4ZTa7m4NhvuRlprd8JaRYQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:bfc2:: with SMTP id p185-v6mr349304oif.285.1540496978595; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m63-v6sm2759234oia.30.2018.10.25.12.49.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:49:37 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Douglas Anderson Cc: Sean Paul , Thierry Reding , Sandeep Panda , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , jsanka@codeaurora.org, ryandcase@chromium.org, Douglas Anderson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: drm/panel: simple: Innolux TV123WAM is actually P120ZDG-BF1 Message-ID: <20181025194937.GA11705@bogus> References: <20181022204639.8558-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20181022204639.8558-6-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181022204639.8558-6-dianders@chromium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:46:39 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote: > As far as I can tell the bindings that were added in commit > 9c04400f7ea6 ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: Document Innolux TV123WAM panel > bindings") weren't actually for Innolux TV123WAM but were actually for > Innolux P120ZDG-BF1. > > As far as I can tell the Innolux TV123WAM isn't a real panel and but > it's a mosh between the TI TV123WAM and the Innolux P120ZDG-BF1. > Let's unmosh. > > Here's my evidence: > > * Searching for TV123WAM on the Internet turns up a TI panel. While > it's possible that an Innolux panel has the same model number as the > TI Panel, it seems a little doubtful. Looking up the datasheet from > the TI Panel shows that it's 1920 x 1280 and 259.2 mm x 172.8 mm. > > * As far as I know, the patch adding the Innolux Panel was supposed to > be for the board that's sitting in front of me as I type this > (support for that board is not yet upstream). On the back of that > panel I see Innolux P120ZDZ-EZ1 rev B1. > > * Someone pointed me at a datasheet that's supposed to be for the > panel in front of me (sorry, I can't share the datasheet). That > datasheet has the string "p120zdg-bf1" > > * If I search for "P120ZDG-BF1" on the Internet I get hits for panels > that are 2160x1440. They don't have datasheets, but the fact that > the resolution matches is a good sign. > > While we doing the rename, also mention that no-hpd can be used with > this panel. See the previous patch in this series ("drm/panel: > simple: Add "no-hpd" delay for Innolux TV123WAM"). > > Fixes: 9c04400f7ea6 ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: Document Innolux TV123WAM panel bindings") > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson > Cc: Sandeep Panda > --- > > .../{innolux,tv123wam.txt => innolux,p120zdg-bf1.txt} | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/{innolux,tv123wam.txt => innolux,p120zdg-bf1.txt} (70%) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring