linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sched/core: Introduce set_next_task() helper for better code readability
@ 2018-10-26 13:17 Muchun Song
  2018-11-04  0:14 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Muchun Song
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Muchun Song @ 2018-10-26 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo, peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel

When we pick the next task, we will do the following for the task:
  1) p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
  2) dequeue_pushable(_dl)_task(rq, p);

When we call set_curr_task(), we also need to do the same thing
above. In rt.c, the code at 1) is in the _pick_next_task_rt()
and the code at 2) is in the pick_next_task_rt(). If we put two
operations in one function, maybe better. So, we introduce a new
function set_next_task(), which is responsible for doing the above.

By introducing the function we can get rid of calling the
dequeue_pushable(_dl)_task() directly(We can call set_next_task())
in pick_next_task() and have better code readability and reuse.
In set_curr_task_rt(), we also can call set_next_task().

Do this things such that we end up with:

  static struct task_struct *pick_next_task(struct rq *rq,
  					    struct task_struct *prev,
  					    struct rq_flags *rf)
  {
  	/* do something else ... */

  	put_prev_task(rq, prev);

  	/* pick next task p */

  	set_next_task(rq, p);

  	/* do something else ... */
  }

put_prev_task() can match set_next_task(), which can make the
code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 kernel/sched/rt.c       | 24 +++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 91e4202b0634..470ba6b464fe 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1695,6 +1695,14 @@ static void start_hrtick_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
+
+	/* You can't push away the running task */
+	dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
+}
+
 static struct sched_dl_entity *pick_next_dl_entity(struct rq *rq,
 						   struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 {
@@ -1750,10 +1758,8 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	BUG_ON(!dl_se);
 
 	p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
-	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
 
-	/* Running task will never be pushed. */
-       dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
+	set_next_task(rq, p);
 
 	if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
 		start_hrtick_dl(rq, p);
@@ -1808,12 +1814,7 @@ static void task_fork_dl(struct task_struct *p)
 
 static void set_curr_task_dl(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = rq->curr;
-
-	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
-
-	/* You can't push away the running task */
-	dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
+	set_next_task(rq, rq->curr);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 2e2955a8cf8f..5dee426a9f24 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1498,6 +1498,14 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flag
 #endif
 }
 
+static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
+
+	/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
+	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+}
+
 static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rq *rq,
 						   struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 {
@@ -1518,7 +1526,6 @@ static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rq *rq,
 static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
-	struct task_struct *p;
 	struct rt_rq *rt_rq  = &rq->rt;
 
 	do {
@@ -1527,10 +1534,7 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
 		rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
 	} while (rt_rq);
 
-	p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
-	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
-
-	return p;
+	return rt_task_of(rt_se);
 }
 
 static struct task_struct *
@@ -1573,8 +1577,7 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 
 	p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
 
-	/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
-	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+	set_next_task(rq, p);
 
 	rt_queue_push_tasks(rq);
 
@@ -2355,12 +2358,7 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
 
 static void set_curr_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = rq->curr;
-
-	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
-
-	/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
-	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+	set_next_task(rq, rq->curr);
 }
 
 static unsigned int get_rr_interval_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-04  0:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-26 13:17 [PATCH] sched/core: Introduce set_next_task() helper for better code readability Muchun Song
2018-11-04  0:14 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Muchun Song

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).