From: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@gmail.com>,
lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, knaack.h@gmx.de,
pmeerw@pmeerw.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com, stefan.popa@analog.com,
giuliano.belinassi@usp.br, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-usp@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 13:52:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181028165231.2det3cq3u7r6qoxj@renatolg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181028155611.67abeafb@archlinux>
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for the review.
>> + voltage_uv = regulator_get_voltage(st->reg);
>> + if (voltage_uv)
>> + st->int_vref_mv = voltage_uv/1000;
>> *val = st->int_vref_mv * st->gain;
>Is there actually a reason (now) to have the stashed value
>of int_vref_mv in the state structure?
From probe:
if (voltage_uv)
st->int_vref_mv = voltage_uv / 1000;
else
dev_warn(&spi->dev, "Reference voltage unspecified\n");
So the idea was to, when voltage_uv = 0, return the previous voltage.
Should I instead handle this as an error the same way as in probe?
Thanks,
Renato
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-28 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-25 22:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: iio: ad7780: correct driver read Renato Lui Geh
2018-10-25 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read Renato Lui Geh
2018-10-28 15:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-10-28 16:52 ` Renato Lui Geh [this message]
2018-10-28 18:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-10-25 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: iio: ad7780: fix offset read value Renato Lui Geh
2018-10-28 15:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181028165231.2det3cq3u7r6qoxj@renatolg \
--to=renatogeh@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=giuliano.belinassi@usp.br \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-usp@googlegroups.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=stefan.popa@analog.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).