linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
	Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:02:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181030150254.GB3385@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181029224031.29809-2-tycho@tycho.ws>

On 10/29, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> +static long seccomp_notify_recv(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
> +				void __user *buf)
> +{
> +	struct seccomp_knotif *knotif = NULL, *cur;
> +	struct seccomp_notif unotif;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +
> +	memset(&unotif, 0, sizeof(unotif));
> +
> +	ret = down_interruptible(&filter->notif->request);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&filter->notify_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(cur, &filter->notif->notifications, list) {
> +		if (cur->state == SECCOMP_NOTIFY_INIT) {
> +			knotif = cur;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we didn't find a notification, it could be that the task was
> +	 * interrupted by a fatal signal between the time we were woken and
> +	 * when we were able to acquire the rw lock.
> +	 *
> +	 * This is the place where we handle the extra high semaphore count
> +	 * mentioned in seccomp_do_user_notification().
> +	 */
> +	if (!knotif) {
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	unotif.id = knotif->id;
> +	unotif.pid = task_pid_vnr(knotif->task);
> +	if (knotif->signaled)
> +		unotif.flags |= SECCOMP_NOTIF_FLAG_SIGNALED;
> +	unotif.data = *(knotif->data);

Tycho, I forgot everything about seccomp, most probably I am wrong but let me
ask anyway.

__seccomp_filter(SECCOMP_RET_TRACE) does

		/*
		 * Recheck the syscall, since it may have changed. This
		 * intentionally uses a NULL struct seccomp_data to force
		 * a reload of all registers. This does not goto skip since
		 * a skip would have already been reported.
		 */
		if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, true))
			return -1;

and the next seccomp_run_filters() can return SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF, right?
seccomp_do_user_notification() doesn't check recheck_after_trace and it simply
does n.data = sd.

Doesn't this mean that "unotif.data = *(knotif->data)" can hit NULL ?

seccomp_run_filters() does populate_seccomp_data() in this case, but this
won't affect "seccomp_data *sd" passed to seccomp_do_user_notification().

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-30 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-29 22:40 [PATCH v8 0/2] seccomp trap to userspace Tycho Andersen
2018-10-29 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] seccomp: add a return code to " Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 14:32   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 15:32     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-01 14:48       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 20:33         ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-02 11:29           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-02 13:50             ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 15:02   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-10-30 15:54     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 16:27       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 16:39         ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 17:21           ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 21:32             ` Kees Cook
2018-10-31 13:04               ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 21:38       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:49   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:54     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 22:00       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 22:32         ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 22:34           ` Kees Cook
2018-10-31  0:29             ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-31  1:29               ` Kees Cook
2018-11-01 13:40   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 19:56     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-02 10:02       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-02 13:38         ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-01 13:56   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-01 19:58     ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-29 23:08   ` Tycho Andersen
2018-11-30 10:17     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-29 22:40 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] samples: add an example of seccomp user trap Tycho Andersen
2018-10-29 23:31   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-10-30  2:05     ` Tycho Andersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181030150254.GB3385@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    --cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).