From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2D1ECDE47 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 22:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC910208A3 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 22:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pH006TlA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CC910208A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732750AbeKIHq3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:46:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40338 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727215AbeKIHq3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:46:29 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [208.72.13.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6874A2089F; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 22:08:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541714937; bh=s2mI98JnojUSX8zM88FJmvYDej55M9g2dtjNbYC/i7k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pH006TlAx7JPqsfskgcupe2LmPl89TxeBT0qo9kgBf8ShVR5WctCYPVsVHQCRaQEI PVBkYTEra5XRVojzX3gZcAbCg9GL1x1OcMcv8HwlHhKgk2d1lnukzSwTrNQkaSq+7g 5IP/044kHvOjhkDjRsn3I7KocHRwzu5VNT2rCrI8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Zhimin Gu , Pavel Machek , Chen Yu , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [PATCH 4.14 27/31] x86, hibernate: Fix nosave_regions setup for hibernation Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:52:51 -0800 Message-Id: <20181108215131.904582752@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181108215129.641434673@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181108215129.641434673@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Zhimin Gu commit cc55f7537db6af371e9c1c6a71161ee40f918824 upstream. On 32bit systems, nosave_regions(non RAM areas) located between max_low_pfn and max_pfn are not excluded from hibernation snapshot currently, which may result in a machine check exception when trying to access these unsafe regions during hibernation: [ 612.800453] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint [ 612.805786] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 5 Bank 6: fe00000000801136 [ 612.814344] mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP !INEXACT! 60:<00000000d90be566> {swsusp_save+0x436/0x560} [ 612.823167] mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 1f5939fe276 ADDR dd000000 MISC 30e0000086 [ 612.830677] mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:306c3 TIME 1529487426 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 24 [ 612.839581] mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii' [ 612.846394] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Processor context corrupt [ 612.853380] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal machine check [ 612.858978] Kernel Offset: 0x18000000 from 0xc1000000 (relocation range: 0xc0000000-0xf7ffdfff) This is because on 32bit systems, pages above max_low_pfn are regarded as high memeory, and accessing unsafe pages might cause expected MCE. On the problematic 32bit system, there are reserved memory above low memory, which triggered the MCE: e820 memory mapping: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009d7ff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009d800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000e0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000d160cfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d160d000-0x00000000d1613fff] ACPI NVS [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d1614000-0x00000000d1a44fff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d1a45000-0x00000000d1ecffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d1ed0000-0x00000000d7eeafff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d7eeb000-0x00000000d7ffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8000000-0x00000000d875ffff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8760000-0x00000000d87fffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8800000-0x00000000d8fadfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d8fae000-0x00000000d8ffffff] ACPI data [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000d9000000-0x00000000da71bfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000da71c000-0x00000000da7fffff] ACPI NVS [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000da800000-0x00000000dbb8bfff] usable [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dbb8c000-0x00000000dbffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dd000000-0x00000000df1fffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000f8000000-0x00000000fbffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec00000-0x00000000fec00fff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed00000-0x00000000fed03fff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fed1c000-0x00000000fed1ffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fee00000-0x00000000fee00fff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ff000000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000041edfffff] usable Fix this problem by changing pfn limit from max_low_pfn to max_pfn. This fix does not impact 64bit system because on 64bit max_low_pfn is the same as max_pfn. Signed-off-by: Zhimin Gu Acked-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Chen Yu Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: All applicable Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c @@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) kvm_guest_init(); e820__reserve_resources(); - e820__register_nosave_regions(max_low_pfn); + e820__register_nosave_regions(max_pfn); x86_init.resources.reserve_resources();