From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/7] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:04:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181111200443.10772-7-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181111200421.GA10551@linux.ibm.com>
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it only checks if the current thread holds the lock regardless of
whether someone else does. This is also a step towards possibly removing
spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index 7cfdfbc910e0..50e25438fb3c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void vgic_irq_set_phys_active(struct vgic_irq *irq, bool active)
*/
static struct kvm_vcpu *vgic_target_oracle(struct vgic_irq *irq)
{
- DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&irq->irq_lock);
/* If the interrupt is active, it must stay on the current vcpu */
if (irq->active)
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static void vgic_sort_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
- DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
list_sort(NULL, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, vgic_irq_cmp);
}
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&irq->irq_lock);
retry:
vcpu = vgic_target_oracle(irq);
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static inline void vgic_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline void vgic_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
{
- DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&irq->irq_lock);
if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
vgic_v2_populate_lr(vcpu, irq, lr);
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int compute_ap_list_depth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
*multi_sgi = false;
- DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) {
int w;
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
bool multi_sgi;
u8 prio = 0xff;
- DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
count = compute_ap_list_depth(vcpu, &multi_sgi);
if (count > kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr || multi_sgi)
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-11 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-11 20:04 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Use lockdep instead of asserting spin_is_locked() for v4.21/v5.0 Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] x86/PCI: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/7] sfc: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-12 13:02 ` Edward Cree
2018-11-12 17:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/7] smsc: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/7] userfaultfd: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] locking/mutex: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] mm: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-15 18:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2018-11-16 7:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-11 20:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181111200443.10772-7-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=ldr709@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).