linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: linus.walleij@linaro.org
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, david.wu@rock-chips.com,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@bq.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rockchip: allow specifying the regmap location for pin-routes
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:00:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181111210047.30375-1-heiko@sntech.de> (raw)

From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@bq.com>

Right now we expect the pin-rounting settings to be in the same area
as the iomux setting itself. And while that seems to be true for all
newer Rockchip socs, back in the wild west days of old this wasn't true.

Nowadays pin settings in the GRF normally stay in the GRF and the same
is true for pins configured from PMU registers. But old socs like the
rk3188 really sprinkle pin settings somewhat randomly through both
for its bank0.

Therefore add the option to specify a location for the route setting,
so that we can map older socs correctly. We'll keep "same" as the
default, so that we only need to specify a location in the corner-cases
described above.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@bq.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
index 95e4a06de019..246bf14c7f72 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
@@ -307,6 +307,12 @@ struct rockchip_mux_recalced_data {
 	u8 mask;
 };
 
+enum rockchip_mux_route_location {
+	ROCKCHIP_ROUTE_SAME = 0,
+	ROCKCHIP_ROUTE_PMU,
+	ROCKCHIP_ROUTE_GRF,
+};
+
 /**
  * struct rockchip_mux_recalced_data: represent a pin iomux data.
  * @bank_num: bank number.
@@ -319,6 +325,7 @@ struct rockchip_mux_route_data {
 	u8 bank_num;
 	u8 pin;
 	u8 func;
+	enum rockchip_mux_route_location route_location;
 	u32 route_offset;
 	u32 route_val;
 };
@@ -1091,7 +1098,7 @@ static struct rockchip_mux_route_data rk3399_mux_route_data[] = {
 };
 
 static bool rockchip_get_mux_route(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin,
-				   int mux, u32 *reg, u32 *value)
+				   int mux, u32 *loc, u32 *reg, u32 *value)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pinctrl *info = bank->drvdata;
 	struct rockchip_pin_ctrl *ctrl = info->ctrl;
@@ -1108,6 +1115,7 @@ static bool rockchip_get_mux_route(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin,
 	if (i >= ctrl->niomux_routes)
 		return false;
 
+	*loc = data->route_location;
 	*reg = data->route_offset;
 	*value = data->route_val;
 
@@ -1210,7 +1218,7 @@ static int rockchip_set_mux(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin, int mux)
 	struct regmap *regmap;
 	int reg, ret, mask, mux_type;
 	u8 bit;
-	u32 data, rmask, route_reg, route_val;
+	u32 data, rmask, route_location, route_reg, route_val;
 
 	ret = rockchip_verify_mux(bank, pin, mux);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -1247,9 +1255,21 @@ static int rockchip_set_mux(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin, int mux)
 		rockchip_get_recalced_mux(bank, pin, &reg, &bit, &mask);
 
 	if (bank->route_mask & BIT(pin)) {
-		if (rockchip_get_mux_route(bank, pin, mux, &route_reg,
-					   &route_val)) {
-			ret = regmap_write(regmap, route_reg, route_val);
+		if (rockchip_get_mux_route(bank, pin, mux, &route_location,
+					   &route_reg, &route_val)) {
+			struct regmap *route_regmap = regmap;
+
+			/* handle special locations */
+			switch (route_location) {
+			case ROCKCHIP_ROUTE_PMU:
+				route_regmap = info->regmap_pmu;
+				break;
+			case ROCKCHIP_ROUTE_GRF:
+				route_regmap = info->regmap_base;
+				break;
+			}
+
+			ret = regmap_write(route_regmap, route_reg, route_val);
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
 		}
-- 
2.18.0


             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-11 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-11 21:00 Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2018-11-11 21:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3188 routes to switch between nand and emmc Heiko Stuebner
2018-11-17 12:19   ` Linus Walleij
2018-11-14 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rockchip: allow specifying the regmap location for pin-routes David Wu
2018-11-17 12:18 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181111210047.30375-1-heiko@sntech.de \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=david.wu@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@bq.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rockchip: allow specifying the regmap location for pin-routes' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).