From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0572DC43610 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FF8216FD for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cl4sH0ez" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B6FF8216FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733159AbeKLISr (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:18:47 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39134 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733142AbeKLISq (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:18:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [206.108.79.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A30B121582; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:28:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541975329; bh=7HmDRDomSlsZaQm9+bwr4Jr0skygfogHoghTtHvXttg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cl4sH0ez+/fUVJK5A4Zmovx2c65oSOM59ysQr0TJR4AQ4SjzpFJ6kxmVPoZxJ3L/X yZm7FUw02FgKNTEamfgIO4J0VI28g2t/Lc8hAPhOaTmPI3hm79aHjGh+lMZTBdqQKE ZYeG0r1Ubh0SMuhzP8n7+bkCu0M2mZFQQLggu0w8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval , Liu Bo , Josef Bacik , David Sterba Subject: [PATCH 4.19 341/361] btrfs: make sure we create all new block groups Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:21:28 -0800 Message-Id: <20181111221700.742041688@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181111221619.915519183@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181111221619.915519183@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Josef Bacik commit 545e3366db823dc3342ca9d7fea803f829c9062f upstream. Allocating new chunks modifies both the extent and chunk tree, which can trigger new chunk allocations. So instead of doing list_for_each_safe, just do while (!list_empty()) so we make sure we don't exit with other pending bg's still on our list. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval Reviewed-by: Liu Bo Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -10094,7 +10094,7 @@ error: void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info; - struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, *tmp; + struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group; struct btrfs_root *extent_root = fs_info->extent_root; struct btrfs_block_group_item item; struct btrfs_key key; @@ -10102,7 +10102,10 @@ void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(s bool can_flush_pending_bgs = trans->can_flush_pending_bgs; trans->can_flush_pending_bgs = false; - list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, tmp, &trans->new_bgs, bg_list) { + while (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) { + block_group = list_first_entry(&trans->new_bgs, + struct btrfs_block_group_cache, + bg_list); if (ret) goto next;