From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B87CC43441 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 23:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4F02084C for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 23:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mA/QUZfe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D4F02084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388999AbeKLIUn (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:20:43 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45956 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388972AbeKLIUm (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:20:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [206.108.79.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC4C4223CB; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:30:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541975446; bh=jMeAZfGf3TgqpUQoCcTu0GJIc2VbP1wylRRJxcOfnwU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mA/QUZfe9bBkCmSH/jM23MADFweMF6cA1t2d5Wa30yNpvZddbiQe5QINqMInoTX67 gwB+0byQOYHjzc2sWq1PklgYpvR3huQ0KXzmO0mUWO0S0dGTg246MAwEQAAATL8ab3 D0BZBb7nxicb7c8dRDVJlq4zCZLeJghPPNEV2L6I= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Luca Coelho , Kalle Valo Subject: [PATCH 4.18 208/350] iwlwifi: mvm: check return value of rs_rate_from_ucode_rate() Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:21:12 -0800 Message-Id: <20181111221716.730166861@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181111221707.043394111@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181111221707.043394111@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Luca Coelho commit 3d71c3f1f50cf309bd20659422af549bc784bfff upstream. The rs_rate_from_ucode_rate() function may return -EINVAL if the rate is invalid, but none of the callsites check for the error, potentially making us access arrays with index IWL_RATE_INVALID, which is larger than the arrays, causing an out-of-bounds access. This will trigger KASAN warnings, such as the one reported in the bugzilla issue mentioned below. This fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200659 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c @@ -1218,7 +1218,11 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm !(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU)) return; - rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(tx_resp_hwrate, info->band, &tx_resp_rate); + if (rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(tx_resp_hwrate, info->band, + &tx_resp_rate)) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return; + } #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS /* Disable last tx check if we are debugging with fixed rate but @@ -1269,7 +1273,10 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm */ table = &lq_sta->lq; lq_hwrate = le32_to_cpu(table->rs_table[0]); - rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(lq_hwrate, info->band, &lq_rate); + if (rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(lq_hwrate, info->band, &lq_rate)) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return; + } /* Here we actually compare this rate to the latest LQ command */ if (lq_color != LQ_FLAG_COLOR_GET(table->flags)) { @@ -1371,8 +1378,12 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm /* Collect data for each rate used during failed TX attempts */ for (i = 0; i <= retries; ++i) { lq_hwrate = le32_to_cpu(table->rs_table[i]); - rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(lq_hwrate, info->band, - &lq_rate); + if (rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(lq_hwrate, info->band, + &lq_rate)) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return; + } + /* * Only collect stats if retried rate is in the same RS * table as active/search. @@ -3241,7 +3252,10 @@ static void rs_build_rates_table_from_fi for (i = 0; i < num_rates; i++) lq_cmd->rs_table[i] = ucode_rate_le32; - rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(ucode_rate, band, &rate); + if (rs_rate_from_ucode_rate(ucode_rate, band, &rate)) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return; + } if (is_mimo(&rate)) lq_cmd->mimo_delim = num_rates - 1;