From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E4CC43441 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 23:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4C020862 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 23:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oLTeR++q" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CC4C020862 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390185AbeKLJDT (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 04:03:19 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50024 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389980AbeKLIVt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:21:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [206.108.79.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD4A8216FD; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:31:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541975511; bh=Lv/6T2HnZN5CwJgYkWU1Ds9OzXYrHh9YLhzy+Slus4Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oLTeR++qkGZH+vRxo6wJpHMVI4UWguOUhZwBlp1Oog/4DZI1V79OBeUjGsSdWte1Z hy2RgtaOeQpOqWJRMe9evHBCiF3Fc4QVE2CdrDaXH+KskhEdbniCEe9OK/HadOM/dM mS2b9iOLgg+77KAaS+WdGFsA75HGyzTpuVa/KJuA= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana , Josef Bacik , David Sterba Subject: [PATCH 4.18 339/350] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:23:23 -0800 Message-Id: <20181111221722.286789523@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181111221707.043394111@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181111221707.043394111@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Josef Bacik commit 21a94f7acf0f748599ea552af5d9ee7d7e41c72f upstream. If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in a lot of fragmentation. We need to make sure we're resetting the max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -4661,6 +4661,7 @@ again: goto out; } else { ret = 1; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; } space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE; @@ -6576,6 +6577,7 @@ static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(str space_info->bytes_readonly += num_bytes; cache->reserved -= num_bytes; space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes; + space_info->max_extent_size = 0; if (delalloc) cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;