From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:55:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181112155559.GV13195@uranus.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181112141456.GA15690@avx2>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
...
> > > int main(void)
> > > {
> > > const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
> > > +#ifdef __arm__
> > > + unsigned long va = 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
> > > +#else
> > > + unsigned long va = 0;
> > > +#endif
...
> >
> > I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a
> > HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least* *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely,
> > attend all architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one,
> > and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
>
> If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is
> a mistake.
>
> Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
>
> > Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2
> > tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED
> > something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
>
> I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
>
> > Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of
> > this test ?
Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that
testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this
took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm
I think we're fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-12 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-10 18:49 [PATCH] proc: fixup map_files test on arm Alexey Dobriyan
2018-11-11 2:48 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2018-11-12 14:14 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2018-11-12 15:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2018-11-12 16:35 ` Rafael David Tinoco
2018-11-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexey Dobriyan
2018-11-13 17:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181112155559.GV13195@uranus.lan \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.tinoco@linaro.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).