linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkelshb@gmail.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	michael.jamet@intel.com, lukas@wunner.de,
	Christian Kellner <ckellner@redhat.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>,
	Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@canonical.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] thunderbolt: Export IOMMU based DMA protection support to userspace
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:55:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113105558.GR2500@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CmpXvZJFk=kYvZybgTtqDWBVP_jSE37tdkQbyGA8U9WOrkoQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 06:59:02PM +0200, Yehezkel Bernat wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:06 PM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Recent systems shipping with Windows 10 version 1803 or later may
> > support a feature called Kernel DMA protection [1]. In practice this
> > means that Thunderbolt connected devices are placed behind an IOMMU
> > during the whole time it is connected (including during boot) making
> > Thunderbolt security levels redundant. Some of these systems still have
> > Thunderbolt security level set to "user" in order to support OS
> > downgrade (the older version of the OS might not support IOMMU based DMA
> > protection so connecting a device still relies on user approval then).
> >
> > Export this information to userspace by introducing a new sysfs
> > attribute (iommu_dma_protection). Based on it userspace tools can make
> > more accurate decision whether or not authorize the connected device.
> >
> > In addition update Thunderbolt documentation regarding IOMMU based DMA
> > protection.
> >
> > [1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/information-protection/kernel-dma-protection-for-thunderbolt
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> 
> I can't comment on the IOMMU side, but the Thunderbolt side looks good to me.

Thanks!

> Just one point:
> Have you considered the option to add this property per (TBT?) device?

No. ;-)

You mean that one device uses security levels and another IOMMU? I don't
think it is possible without having some sort of table in the IOMMU
driver telling which devices it needs identity map and which not. Also
not sure what would be the benefit?

> If the kernel may decide to enable/disable the IOMMU or AST per device, maybe
> it should be on this level.
> Or maybe the IOMMU decision isn't going to change (it's system-wide) and the AST
> decision will be communicated per device by a new sysfs attribute anyway, if
> needed?

Not sure what you mean by "AST"? The IOMMU decision is pretty much
system-wide.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-13 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-12 16:06 [PATCH 0/4] PCI / iommu / thunderbolt: IOMMU based DMA protection Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI / ACPI: Identify external PCI devices Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 18:02   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-11-13 10:56     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-13 11:27       ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-13 11:45         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-15 10:22           ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-15 11:13             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-15 11:37               ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-15 12:07                 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-11-15 12:16                   ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-15 17:46                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-15 17:58                       ` Yehezkel Bernat
2018-11-15 19:10                         ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-15 19:27                           ` Lukas Wunner
2018-11-15 19:32                             ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-16  9:18                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16  9:32                             ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-22 10:48                               ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-22 10:59                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15 19:00                       ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-15 19:33                         ` Mario.Limonciello
2018-11-16 10:57                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-20 21:43                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-11-21 12:40                               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-16  7:01                         ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Force IOMMU on for platform opt in hint Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 17:49   ` Raj, Ashok
2018-11-12 18:09   ` Alex Williamson
2018-11-12 19:51     ` Raj, Ashok
2018-11-12 16:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Do not enable ATS for external devices Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 17:53   ` Raj, Ashok
2018-11-12 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] thunderbolt: Export IOMMU based DMA protection support to userspace Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 16:22   ` Mario.Limonciello
2018-11-13 10:36     ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 16:59   ` Yehezkel Bernat
2018-11-13 10:55     ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2018-11-13 11:13       ` Yehezkel Bernat
2018-11-13 11:40         ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-13 14:42           ` Yehezkel Bernat
     [not found]             ` <20181113152038.GD2500@lahna.fi.intel.com>
2018-11-13 15:38               ` Yehezkel Bernat
2018-11-13 16:12                 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-12 18:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI / iommu / thunderbolt: IOMMU based DMA protection Lukas Wunner
2018-11-12 19:04   ` Yehezkel Bernat
2018-11-13 11:13   ` Mika Westerberg
2018-11-13  8:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-11-13 11:32   ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181113105558.GR2500@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=anthony.wong@canonical.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ckellner@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=yehezkelshb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).