linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH V9 17/19] block: don't use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 23:15:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113151505.15498-18-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181113151505.15498-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

It is wrong to use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out how many segments
there are in the bio even though CLONED flag isn't set on this bio,
because this bio may be splitted or advanced.

So always use bio_segments() in blk_recount_segments(), and it shouldn't
cause any performance loss now because the physical segment number is figured
out in blk_queue_split() and BIO_SEG_VALID is set meantime since
bdced438acd83ad83a6c ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting").

Fixes: 7f60dcaaf91 ("block: blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments()")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index cb9f49bcfd36..153a659fde74 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -429,13 +429,7 @@ void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
 
 void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 {
-	unsigned short seg_cnt;
-
-	/* estimate segment number by bi_vcnt for non-cloned bio */
-	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED))
-		seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
-	else
-		seg_cnt = bio->bi_vcnt;
+	unsigned short seg_cnt = bio_segments(bio);
 
 	if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE, &q->queue_flags) &&
 			(seg_cnt < queue_max_segments(q)))
-- 
2.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-13 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-13 15:14 [PATCH V9 00/19] block: support multi-page bvec Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 01/19] block: introduce multi-page page bvec helpers Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 02/19] block: introduce bio_for_each_bvec() Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 03/19] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to compute multi-page bvec count Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 04/19] block: use bio_for_each_bvec() to map sg Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 05/19] block: introduce bvec_last_segment() Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 06/19] fs/buffer.c: use bvec iterator to truncate the bio Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 07/19] btrfs: use bvec_last_segment to get bio's last page Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 08/19] btrfs: move bio_pages_all() to btrfs Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 09/19] block: introduce bio_bvecs() Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 10/19] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 11/19] bcache: avoid to use bio_for_each_segment_all() in bch_bio_alloc_pages() Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 12/19] block: allow bio_for_each_segment_all() to iterate over multi-page bvec Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:14 ` [PATCH V9 13/19] iomap & xfs: only account for new added page Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:15 ` [PATCH V9 14/19] block: enable multipage bvecs Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:15 ` [PATCH V9 15/19] block: always define BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256 Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:15 ` [PATCH V9 16/19] block: document usage of bio iterator helpers Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:15 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-11-13 15:15 ` [PATCH V9 18/19] block: kill QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE Ming Lei
2018-11-13 15:15 ` [PATCH V9 19/19] block: kill BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE Ming Lei
2018-11-14  2:44 ` [PATCH V9 00/19] block: support multi-page bvec Dave Chinner
2018-11-14  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-14 15:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-15  9:35     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181113151505.15498-18-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V9 17/19] block: don'\''t use bio->bi_vcnt to figure out segment number' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).