Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter immovable memory

[Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>]

 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter immovable memory

s/srat/SRAT/g

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:46:45PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> KASLR may randomly chooses some positions which are located in movable

		    choose

> memory regions. This will break memory hotplug feature and make the
> movable memory chosen by KASLR can't be removed.

			by KASLR practically immovable.

:)

> The solution is limite KASLR to choose memory regions in immovable

limite?

"to limit"

> node according to SRAT tables.
> 
> If CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE enabled, walk through the SRAT memory

			   *is* enabled,

> tables and store those immovable memory regions so that KASLR can get
> where to choose for randomization.
> 
> If the amount of immovable memory regions is not zero, which
> means the immovable memory regions existing. Calculate the intersection
> between memory regions from e820/efi memory table and immovable memory
> regions.

This is explaining *what* the patch does and generally doesn't need to
be in the commit messge as people can read it in the patch itself.

> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index b251572e77af..174d2114045e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ static bool memmap_too_large;
>  /* Store memory limit specified by "mem=nn[KMG]" or "memmap=nn[KMG]" */
>  static unsigned long long mem_limit = ULLONG_MAX;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +/* Store the immovable memory regions */
> +extern struct mem_vector immovable_mem[MAX_NUMNODES*2];
> +#endif

For this and the other occurrences of ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE,
define empty stubs for those functions in a header and remove the
ifdeffery at the call sites.

> +
>  
>  enum mem_avoid_index {
>  	MEM_AVOID_ZO_RANGE = 0,
> @@ -413,6 +418,11 @@ static void mem_avoid_init(unsigned long input, unsigned long input_size,
>  	/* Mark the memmap regions we need to avoid */
>  	handle_mem_options();
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +	/* Mark the immovable regions we need to choose */
> +	get_immovable_mem();
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP
>  	/* Make sure video RAM can be used. */
>  	add_identity_map(0, PMD_SIZE);
> @@ -568,9 +578,9 @@ static unsigned long slots_fetch_random(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
> -			       unsigned long minimum,
> -			       unsigned long image_size)
> +static void slots_count(struct mem_vector *entry,

That's a strange rename.

__process_mem_region() makes more sense to me.

> +			unsigned long minimum,
> +			unsigned long image_size)
>  {
>  	struct mem_vector region, overlap;
>  	unsigned long start_orig, end;
> @@ -646,6 +656,57 @@ static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static bool process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *region,
> +			       unsigned long long minimum,
> +			       unsigned long long image_size)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	/*
> +	 * If no immovable memory found, or MEMORY_HOTREMOVE disabled,
> +	 * walk all the regions, so use region directely.

"directly"

> +	 */
> +	if (num_immovable_mem == 0) {

	if (!...

> +		slots_count(region, minimum, image_size);
> +
> +		if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> +			debug_putstr("Aborted e820/efi memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.