From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BC5C43441 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528A12086A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:20:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 528A12086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729753AbeKTAnv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:43:51 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58430 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726235AbeKTAnv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:43:51 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E1E15BF; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 06:20:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from queper01-lin.local (queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.48]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAA313F5AF; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 06:20:01 -0800 (PST) From: Quentin Perret To: peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, smuckle@google.com, adharmap@codeaurora.org, skannan@codeaurora.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, edubezval@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, currojerez@riseup.net, javi.merino@kernel.org, quentin.perret@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v9 12/15] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:18:54 +0000 Message-Id: <20181119141857.8625-13-quentin.perret@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181119141857.8625-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20181119141857.8625-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Morten Rasmussen Energy-aware scheduling is only meant to be active while the system is _not_ over-utilized. That is, there are spare cycles available to shift tasks around based on their actual utilization to get a more energy-efficient task distribution without depriving any tasks. When above the tipping point task placement is done the traditional way based on load_avg, spreading the tasks across as many cpus as possible based on priority scaled load to preserve smp_nice. Below the tipping point we want to use util_avg instead. We need to define a criteria for when we make the switch. The util_avg for each cpu converges towards 100% regardless of how many additional tasks we may put on it. If we define over-utilized as: sum_{cpus}(rq.cfs.avg.util_avg) + margin > sum_{cpus}(rq.capacity) some individual cpus may be over-utilized running multiple tasks even when the above condition is false. That should be okay as long as we try to spread the tasks out to avoid per-cpu over-utilization as much as possible and if all tasks have the _same_ priority. If the latter isn't true, we have to consider priority to preserve smp_nice. For example, we could have n_cpus nice=-10 util_avg=55% tasks and n_cpus/2 nice=0 util_avg=60% tasks. Balancing based on util_avg we are likely to end up with nice=-10 tasks sharing cpus and nice=0 tasks getting their own as we 1.5*n_cpus tasks in total and 55%+55% is less over-utilized than 55%+60% for those cpus that have to be shared. The system utilization is only 85% of the system capacity, but we are breaking smp_nice. To be sure not to break smp_nice, we have defined over-utilization conservatively as when any cpu in the system is fully utilized at its highest frequency instead: cpu_rq(any).cfs.avg.util_avg + margin > cpu_rq(any).capacity IOW, as soon as one cpu is (nearly) 100% utilized, we switch to load_avg to factor in priority to preserve smp_nice. With this definition, we can skip periodic load-balance as no cpu has an always-running task when the system is not over-utilized. All tasks will be periodic and we can balance them at wake-up. This conservative condition does however mean that some scenarios that could benefit from energy-aware decisions even if one cpu is fully utilized would not get those benefits. For systems where some cpus might have reduced capacity on some cpus (RT-pressure and/or big.LITTLE), we want periodic load-balance checks as soon a just a single cpu is fully utilized as it might one of those with reduced capacity and in that case we want to migrate it. cc: Ingo Molnar cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen [ Added a comment explaining why new tasks are not accounted during overutilization detection ] Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +++ 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index e21f37129395..c3b2dad72c9c 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5082,6 +5082,24 @@ static inline void hrtick_update(struct rq *rq) } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +static inline unsigned long cpu_util(int cpu); +static unsigned long capacity_of(int cpu); + +static inline bool cpu_overutilized(int cpu) +{ + return (capacity_of(cpu) * 1024) < (cpu_util(cpu) * capacity_margin); +} + +static inline void update_overutilized_status(struct rq *rq) +{ + if (!READ_ONCE(rq->rd->overutilized) && cpu_overutilized(rq->cpu)) + WRITE_ONCE(rq->rd->overutilized, SG_OVERUTILIZED); +} +#else +static inline void update_overutilized_status(struct rq *rq) { } +#endif + /* * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and @@ -5139,8 +5157,26 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) update_cfs_group(se); } - if (!se) + if (!se) { add_nr_running(rq, 1); + /* + * Since new tasks are assigned an initial util_avg equal to + * half of the spare capacity of their CPU, tiny tasks have the + * ability to cross the overutilized threshold, which will + * result in the load balancer ruining all the task placement + * done by EAS. As a way to mitigate that effect, do not account + * for the first enqueue operation of new tasks during the + * overutilized flag detection. + * + * A better way of solving this problem would be to wait for + * the PELT signals of tasks to converge before taking them + * into account, but that is not straightforward to implement, + * and the following generally works well enough in practice. + */ + if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) + update_overutilized_status(rq); + + } hrtick_update(rq); } @@ -7940,6 +7976,9 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, if (nr_running > 1) *sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD; + if (cpu_overutilized(i)) + *sg_status |= SG_OVERUTILIZED; + #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING sgs->nr_numa_running += rq->nr_numa_running; sgs->nr_preferred_running += rq->nr_preferred_running; @@ -8170,8 +8209,15 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd env->fbq_type = fbq_classify_group(&sds->busiest_stat); if (!env->sd->parent) { + struct root_domain *rd = env->dst_rq->rd; + /* update overload indicator if we are at root domain */ - WRITE_ONCE(env->dst_rq->rd->overload, sg_status & SG_OVERLOAD); + WRITE_ONCE(rd->overload, sg_status & SG_OVERLOAD); + + /* Update over-utilization (tipping point, U >= 0) indicator */ + WRITE_ONCE(rd->overutilized, sg_status & SG_OVERUTILIZED); + } else if (sg_status & SG_OVERUTILIZED) { + WRITE_ONCE(env->dst_rq->rd->overutilized, SG_OVERUTILIZED); } } @@ -8398,6 +8444,14 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env) * this level. */ update_sd_lb_stats(env, &sds); + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_energy_present)) { + struct root_domain *rd = env->dst_rq->rd; + + if (rcu_dereference(rd->pd) && !READ_ONCE(rd->overutilized)) + goto out_balanced; + } + local = &sds.local_stat; busiest = &sds.busiest_stat; @@ -9798,6 +9852,7 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued) task_tick_numa(rq, curr); update_misfit_status(curr, rq); + update_overutilized_status(task_rq(curr)); } /* diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index bd759ade7351..30f59a912289 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ struct perf_domain { /* Scheduling group status flags */ #define SG_OVERLOAD 0x1 /* More than one runnable task on a CPU. */ +#define SG_OVERUTILIZED 0x2 /* One or more CPUs are over-utilized. */ /* * We add the notion of a root-domain which will be used to define per-domain @@ -740,6 +741,9 @@ struct root_domain { */ int overload; + /* Indicate one or more cpus over-utilized (tipping point) */ + int overutilized; + /* * The bit corresponding to a CPU gets set here if such CPU has more * than one runnable -deadline task (as it is below for RT tasks). -- 2.19.1