linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<keescook@chromium.org>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
	<msys.mizuma@gmail.com>, <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find immovable memory
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:18:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120061804.GA32284@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181116111654.GC20313@zn.tnic>

Hi Boris,

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:16:54PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:46:44PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
>> To avoid KASLR extracting kernel on movable memory, slove the
>						      ^^^^^
>
>Please introduce a spellchecker into your patch creation workflow.
>
>> conflict between KASLR and movable_node feature, dig the SRAT tables
>
>s/dig/determine/ or "compute SRAT table's address" or so.
>
>Also, replace "dig" with a more suitable verb in all your patches.
>
>> from RSDP pointer. Walk the SRAT tables and store the immovable
>> memory regions in immovable_mem[].
>
>		"... in an array called immovable_mem[]."
>
>> There are three methods to get RSDP pointer: KEXEC condition,
>> EFI confition, BIOS condition.
>
>"condition" is not the right word here.
>
>> If KEXEC add 'acpi_rsdp' to cmdline, use it.
>> Otherwise, parse EFI table for RSDP.
>> Then, search memory for RSDP.
>> 
>> Imitate from ACPI code, based on acpi_os_get_root_pointer().
>> Process: RSDP->RSDT/XSDT->ACPI root table->SRAT.
>
>What?!
>
>This looks like a comment you've added as a note for yourself but not
>part of the final commit message. If you wanna explain the process, then
>write it out in plain english as if you're explaining it to someone who
>doesn't know what you're doing.
>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile |   4 +
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c  |   4 -
>>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h   |  15 ++++
>>  4 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
>> index 466f66c8a7f8..b51f7629b8ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
>> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>  	vmlinux-objs-y += $(obj)/pgtable_64.o
>>  endif
>>  
>> +#if (defined CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE) && (defined CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE)
>> +vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE) += $(obj)/acpitb.o
>> +#endif
>
>Right, as previously pointed out, this needs that CONFIG_ symbol and
>then you can save yourself most (if not all) of the ifdeffery in the
>rest of the patchset.
>
>> +
>>  $(obj)/eboot.o: KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fshort-wchar -mno-red-zone
>>  
>>  vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_EFI_STUB) += $(obj)/eboot.o $(obj)/efi_stub_$(BITS).o \
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c
>> index 5cfb4efa5a19..161f21a7fb3b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
>>  #define BOOT_STRING
>>  #include "../string.h"
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> +/* Store the immovable memory regions */
>> +struct mem_vector immovable_mem[MAX_NUMNODES*2];
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  /* Search EFI table for RSDP table. */
>>  static void efi_get_rsdp_addr(acpi_physical_address *rsdp_addr)
>>  {
>> @@ -226,3 +231,137 @@ static void get_acpi_rsdp(acpi_physical_address *rsdp_addr)
>>  	}
>>  #endif
>>  }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Used to dig RSDP table from EFI table or BIOS.
>> + * If RSDP table found in EFI table, use it. Or search BIOS.
>> + * Based on acpi_os_get_root_pointer().
>> + */
>> +static acpi_physical_address get_rsdp_addr(void)
>> +{
>> +	acpi_physical_address pa = 0;
>> +
>> +	get_acpi_rsdp(&pa);
>> +
>> +	if (!pa)
>> +		efi_get_rsdp_addr(&pa);
>> +
>> +	if (!pa)
>> +		bios_get_rsdp_addr(&pa);
>> +
>> +	return pa;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_table_header *get_acpi_srat_table(void)
>> +{
>> +	acpi_physical_address acpi_table;
>> +	acpi_physical_address root_table;
>> +	struct acpi_table_header *header;
>> +	struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp;
>> +	bool acpi_use_rsdt = false;
>> +	char *signature;
>> +	char arg[10];
>> +	u8 *entry;
>> +	u32 count;
>> +	u32 size;
>> +	int i, j;
>> +	int ret;
>> +	u32 len;
>> +
>> +	rsdp = (struct acpi_table_rsdp *)get_rsdp_addr();
>> +	if (!rsdp)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> +	if (ret == 4 && !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4))
>> +		acpi_use_rsdt = true;
>> +
>> +	/* Get RSDT or XSDT from RSDP. */
>> +	if (!acpi_use_rsdt &&
>> +	    rsdp->xsdt_physical_address && rsdp->revision > 1) {
>> +		root_table = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> +		size = ACPI_XSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> +	} else {
>> +		root_table = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address;
>> +		size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
>> +	}
>
>Reorganize that code here to get rid of acpi_use_rsdt.
>
>> +
>> +	/* Get ACPI root table from RSDT or XSDT.*/
>> +	header = (struct acpi_table_header *)root_table;
>> +	len = header->length;
>
>No checking of that header pointer before dereffing it?
>
>If it is NUL, that gives you a very nasty bug to try to debug in the
>early code.
>
>> +	count = (u32)((len - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) / size);
>
>Uuh, no checking for count wrapping around here due to wrong len? That
>would give you a *lot* of looping below if it wraps.
>
>IOW, you need to verify all those values before doing arithmetic with
>them - it is early code and it is BIOS - there's no trusting it.
>
>Also, it is not "count" but "num_entries" or so.
>
>> +	entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(u8, header, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>
>That variable i is not needed, right?
>
>	while (num_entries--)
>
>?
>
>> +		u64 address64;
>> +
>> +		if (size == ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE)
>> +			acpi_table = ((acpi_physical_address)
>> +				      (*ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, entry)));
>> +		else {
>> +			*(u64 *)(void *)&address64 = *(u64 *)(void *)entry;
>> +			acpi_table = (acpi_physical_address) address64;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (acpi_table) {
>
>Now can acpi_table be NUL here?

In iacpi_tb_parse_root_table() of drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c:
                /* Skip NULL entries in RSDT/XSDT */

                if (!address) {
                        goto next_table;
                }
So I think the table might be NULL and did the similar operation.

Thanks,
Chao Fan

>
>> +			header = (struct acpi_table_header *)acpi_table;
>> +			signature = header->signature;
>> +
>> +			if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(header->signature, ACPI_SIG_SRAT))
>> +				return header;
>> +		}
>> +		entry += size;
>> +	}
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * According to ACPI table, filter the immvoable memory regions
>					  ^^^^^^^^^
>Typo.
>
>> + * and store them in immovable_mem[].
>> + */
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_table_header *table_header;
>> +	struct acpi_subtable_header *table;
>> +	struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma;
>> +	unsigned long table_end;
>> +	char arg[10];
>> +	int i = 0;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg));
>> +	if (ret == 3 && !strncmp(arg, "off", 3))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (!cmdline_find_option_bool("movable_node"))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	table_header = get_acpi_srat_table();
>> +	if (!table_header)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	table_end = (unsigned long)table_header + table_header->length;
>> +
>> +	table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> +		((unsigned long)table_header + sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat));
>> +
>> +	while (((unsigned long)table) +
>> +		       sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) {
>> +		if (table->type == ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY) {
>> +			ma = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)table;
>> +			if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) {
>> +				immovable_mem[i].start = ma->base_address;
>> +				immovable_mem[i].size = ma->length;
>> +				i++;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2) {
>> +				debug_putstr("Too many immovable memory regions, aborted.\n");
>
>"..., aborting."
>
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +		table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> +			((unsigned long)table + table->length);
>> +	}
>> +	num_immovable_mem = i;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> index 9ed9709d9947..b251572e77af 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> @@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ static unsigned long get_boot_seed(void)
>>  #define KASLR_COMPRESSED_BOOT
>>  #include "../../lib/kaslr.c"
>>  
>> -struct mem_vector {
>> -	unsigned long long start;
>> -	unsigned long long size;
>> -};
>>  
>>  /* Only supporting at most 4 unusable memmap regions with kaslr */
>>  #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS	4
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> index a1d5918765f3..4a3645fda0ed 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ void choose_random_location(unsigned long input,
>>  			    unsigned long *output,
>>  			    unsigned long output_size,
>>  			    unsigned long *virt_addr);
>> +struct mem_vector {
>> +	unsigned long long start;
>> +	unsigned long long size;
>> +};
>> +
>>  /* cpuflags.c */
>>  bool has_cpuflag(int flag);
>>  #else
>> @@ -116,3 +121,13 @@ static inline void console_init(void)
>>  void set_sev_encryption_mask(void);
>>  
>>  #endif
>> +
>> +/* acpitb.c */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
>> +int num_immovable_mem;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> +/* Store the amount of immovable memory regions */
>
>Above says "regions" but define below is "TABLES". Hmmm?
>
>> +#define ACPI_MAX_TABLES                128
>> +void get_immovable_mem(void);
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
>> -- 
>
>-- 
>Regards/Gruss,
>    Boris.
>
>Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
>
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-12  9:46 [PATCH v11 0/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr in immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-11-12  9:46 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] x86/boot: Add efi_get_rsdp_addr() to dig out RSDP from EFI table Chao Fan
2018-11-12 14:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13  1:57     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12  9:46 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] x86/boot: Add bios_get_rsdp_addr() to search RSDP in memory Chao Fan
2018-11-12 15:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13  2:10     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 10:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-12  9:46 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] x86/boot: Add get_acpi_rsdp() to parse RSDP in cmdlien from kexec Chao Fan
2018-11-12  9:50   ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 17:43   ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13  2:12     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 16:11       ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 17:22         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13 17:54         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-13 20:06           ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13 21:51             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-14  6:12               ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 18:30                 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19  1:16                   ` Chao Fan
2018-11-13 17:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-14  1:54     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14  1:59       ` Chao Fan
2018-11-14 18:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-12  9:46 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] x86/boot: Dig out SRAT table from RSDP and find immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-11-12 20:52   ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13  2:43     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-12 21:51   ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-11-13  2:45     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-16 11:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19  2:08     ` Chao Fan
2018-11-20  6:18     ` Chao Fan [this message]
2018-11-12  9:46 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Walk srat tables to filter " Chao Fan
2018-11-16 13:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-11-19  1:31     ` Chao Fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181120061804.GA32284@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).