linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: karn@ka9q.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hard-coded limit on unresolved multicast route cache in ipv4/ipmr.c causes slow, unreliable creation of multicast routes on busy networks
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:23:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120092321.GR24677@leo.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180721.220309.1193443933653884021.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David,

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:03:09PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Yeah that limit is bogus for several reasons.
...
> 
> Therefore, it probably is safe and correct to remove this
> cache_resolve_queue_len altogether.
> 
> Something like this:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mroute_base.h b/include/linux/mroute_base.h
> index d633f737b3c6..b166465d7c05 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mroute_base.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mroute_base.h
> @@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ struct mr_table_ops {
>   * @mfc_hash: Hash table of all resolved routes for easy lookup
>   * @mfc_cache_list: list of resovled routes for possible traversal
>   * @maxvif: Identifier of highest value vif currently in use
> - * @cache_resolve_queue_len: current size of unresolved queue
>   * @mroute_do_assert: Whether to inform userspace on wrong ingress
>   * @mroute_do_pim: Whether to receive IGMP PIMv1
>   * @mroute_reg_vif_num: PIM-device vif index
> @@ -251,7 +250,6 @@ struct mr_table {
>  	struct rhltable		mfc_hash;
>  	struct list_head	mfc_cache_list;
>  	int			maxvif;
> -	atomic_t		cache_resolve_queue_len;
>  	bool			mroute_do_assert;
>  	bool			mroute_do_pim;
>  	int			mroute_reg_vif_num;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> index 9f79b9803a16..c007cf9bfe82 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> @@ -747,8 +747,6 @@ static void ipmr_destroy_unres(struct mr_table *mrt, struct mfc_cache *c)
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct nlmsgerr *e;
>  
> -	atomic_dec(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
> -
>  	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&c->_c.mfc_un.unres.unresolved))) {
>  		if (ip_hdr(skb)->version == 0) {
>  			struct nlmsghdr *nlh = skb_pull(skb,
> @@ -1135,9 +1133,11 @@ static int ipmr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, vifi_t vifi,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!found) {
> +		bool was_empty;
> +
>  		/* Create a new entry if allowable */
> -		if (atomic_read(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len) >= 10 ||
> -		    (c = ipmr_cache_alloc_unres()) == NULL) {
> +		c = ipmr_cache_alloc_unres();
> +		if (!c) {
>  			spin_unlock_bh(&mfc_unres_lock);
>  
>  			kfree_skb(skb);
> @@ -1163,11 +1163,11 @@ static int ipmr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, vifi_t vifi,
>  			return err;
>  		}
>  
> -		atomic_inc(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
> +		was_empty = list_empty(&mrt->mfc_unres_queue);
>  		list_add(&c->_c.list, &mrt->mfc_unres_queue);
>  		mroute_netlink_event(mrt, c, RTM_NEWROUTE);
>  
> -		if (atomic_read(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len) == 1)
> +		if (was_empty)
>  			mod_timer(&mrt->ipmr_expire_timer,
>  				  c->_c.mfc_un.unres.expires);

In ipmr_expire_process() and ipmr_do_expire_process(), they start mod_timer
when !list_empty(&mrt->mfc_unres_queue), should here also be !was_empty?

BTW, do you have any plan to apply this patch in kernel?

Regards
Hangbin

>  	}
> @@ -1274,7 +1274,6 @@ static int ipmr_mfc_add(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
>  		if (uc->mfc_origin == c->mfc_origin &&
>  		    uc->mfc_mcastgrp == c->mfc_mcastgrp) {
>  			list_del(&_uc->list);
> -			atomic_dec(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
>  			found = true;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1322,7 +1321,7 @@ static void mroute_clean_tables(struct mr_table *mrt, bool all)
>  		mr_cache_put(c);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (atomic_read(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len) != 0) {
> +	if (!list_empty(&mrt->mfc_unres_queue)) {
>  		spin_lock_bh(&mfc_unres_lock);
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(c, tmp, &mrt->mfc_unres_queue, list) {
>  			list_del(&c->list);
> @@ -2648,9 +2647,19 @@ static int ipmr_rtm_route(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  		return ipmr_mfc_delete(tbl, &mfcc, parent);
>  }
>  
> +static int queue_count(struct mr_table *mrt)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *pos;
> +	int count = 0;
> +	
> +	list_for_each(pos, &mrt->mfc_unres_queue)
> +		count++;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
>  static bool ipmr_fill_table(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	u32 queue_len = atomic_read(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
> +	u32 queue_len = queue_count(mrt);
>  
>  	if (nla_put_u32(skb, IPMRA_TABLE_ID, mrt->id) ||
>  	    nla_put_u32(skb, IPMRA_TABLE_CACHE_RES_QUEUE_LEN, queue_len) ||
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
> index 0d0f0053bb11..75e9c5a3e7ea 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
> @@ -759,8 +759,6 @@ static void ip6mr_destroy_unres(struct mr_table *mrt, struct mfc6_cache *c)
>  	struct net *net = read_pnet(&mrt->net);
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  
> -	atomic_dec(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
> -
>  	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&c->_c.mfc_un.unres.unresolved)) != NULL) {
>  		if (ipv6_hdr(skb)->version == 0) {
>  			struct nlmsghdr *nlh = skb_pull(skb,
> @@ -1139,8 +1137,8 @@ static int ip6mr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, mifi_t mifi,
>  		 *	Create a new entry if allowable
>  		 */
>  
> -		if (atomic_read(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len) >= 10 ||
> -		    (c = ip6mr_cache_alloc_unres()) == NULL) {
> +		c = ip6mr_cache_alloc_unres();
> +		if (!c) {
>  			spin_unlock_bh(&mfc_unres_lock);
>  
>  			kfree_skb(skb);
> @@ -1167,7 +1165,6 @@ static int ip6mr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, mifi_t mifi,
>  			return err;
>  		}
>  
> -		atomic_inc(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
>  		list_add(&c->_c.list, &mrt->mfc_unres_queue);
>  		mr6_netlink_event(mrt, c, RTM_NEWROUTE);
>  
> @@ -1455,7 +1452,6 @@ static int ip6mr_mfc_add(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
>  		if (ipv6_addr_equal(&uc->mf6c_origin, &c->mf6c_origin) &&
>  		    ipv6_addr_equal(&uc->mf6c_mcastgrp, &c->mf6c_mcastgrp)) {
>  			list_del(&_uc->list);
> -			atomic_dec(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len);
>  			found = true;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1502,7 +1498,7 @@ static void mroute_clean_tables(struct mr_table *mrt, bool all)
>  		mr_cache_put(c);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (atomic_read(&mrt->cache_resolve_queue_len) != 0) {
> +	if (!list_empty(&mrt->mfc_unres_queue)) {
>  		spin_lock_bh(&mfc_unres_lock);
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(c, tmp, &mrt->mfc_unres_queue, list) {
>  			list_del(&c->list);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-22  1:31 hard-coded limit on unresolved multicast route cache in ipv4/ipmr.c causes slow, unreliable creation of multicast routes on busy networks Phil Karn
2018-07-22  5:03 ` David Miller
2018-07-22  5:32   ` Phil Karn
2018-11-20  9:23   ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
     [not found]     ` <CADiZnkSy=rFq5xLs6RcgJDihQ1Vwo2WBBY9Fi_5jOHr8XupukQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-26  6:58       ` Hangbin Liu
2018-12-04  6:51       ` Hangbin Liu
     [not found]         ` <CADiZnkTm3UMdZ+ivPXFeTJS+_2ZaiQh7D8wWnsw0BNGfxa0C4w@mail.gmail.com>
2018-12-19  5:55           ` David Miller
2019-06-25  6:15             ` Hangbin Liu
2019-06-25 20:03               ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181120092321.GR24677@leo.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=karn@ka9q.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).