linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/25] vtime: Exit vtime before exit_notify()
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:54:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120135459.GR2131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1542163569-20047-9-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:45:52AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index d458d65..27e0544 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ struct task_cputime {
>  enum vtime_state {
>  	/* Task is sleeping or running in a CPU with VTIME inactive: */
>  	VTIME_INACTIVE = 0,
> +	/* Task has passed exit_notify() */
> +	VTIME_DEAD,

How does it make sense for VTIME_DEAD > VTIME_INACTIVE ?

>  	/* Task is idle */
>  	VTIME_IDLE,
>  	/* Task runs in kernelspace in a CPU with VTIME active: */


> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index f64afd7..a0c3a82 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -813,17 +813,31 @@ void vtime_task_switch_generic(struct task_struct *prev)
>  {
>  	struct vtime *vtime = &prev->vtime;
>  
> -	write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
> -	if (vtime->state == VTIME_IDLE)
> -		vtime_account_idle(prev);
> -	else
> -		__vtime_account_kernel(prev, vtime);
> -	vtime->state = VTIME_INACTIVE;
> -	vtime->cpu = -1;
> -	write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
> +	/*
> +	 * Flush the prev task vtime, unless it has passed
> +	 * vtime_exit_task(), in which case there is nothing
> +	 * left to account.
> +	 */
> +	if (vtime->state != VTIME_DEAD) {
> +		write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
> +		if (vtime->state == VTIME_IDLE)
> +			vtime_account_idle(prev);
> +		else
> +			__vtime_account_kernel(prev, vtime);
> +		vtime->state = VTIME_INACTIVE;
> +		vtime->cpu = -1;
> +		write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
> +	}
>  
>  	vtime = &current->vtime;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Ignore the next task if it has been preempted after
> +	 * vtime_exit_task().
> +	 */
> +	if (vtime->state == VTIME_DEAD)
> +		return;
> +
>  	write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
>  	if (is_idle_task(current))
>  		vtime->state = VTIME_IDLE;

Bit inconsistent; having the one as a indent and the other as an early
return.

> @@ -850,6 +864,30 @@ void vtime_init_idle(struct task_struct *t, int cpu)
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * This is the final settlement point after which we don't account
> + * anymore vtime for this task.
> + */
> +void vtime_exit_task(struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> +	struct vtime *vtime = &t->vtime;
> +	unsigned long flags;

Note that the code in vtime_task_switch_generic() (above) relies on @t
== current (which is true, but not explicit).

> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
> +	/*
> +	 * A task that has never run on a nohz_full CPU hasn't
> +	 * been tracked by vtime. Thus it's in VTIME_INACTIVE
> +	 * state. Nothing to account for it.
> +	 */
> +	if (vtime->state != VTIME_INACTIVE)
> +		vtime_account_system(t, vtime);
> +	vtime->state = VTIME_DEAD;
> +	vtime->cpu = -1;
> +	write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +}
> +
>  u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t)
>  {
>  	struct vtime *vtime = &t->vtime;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-14  2:45 [PATCH 00/25] sched/nohz: Make kcpustat vtime aware (Fix kcpustat on nohz_full) Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 01/25] sched/vtime: Fix guest/system mis-accounting on task switch Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 02/25] sched/vtime: Protect idle accounting under vtime seqcount Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 13:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 03/25] vtime: Rename vtime_account_system() to vtime_account_kernel() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 04/25] vtime: Spare a seqcount lock/unlock cycle on context switch Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 13:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-25 14:42     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 05/25] sched/vtime: Record CPU under seqcount for kcpustat needs Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 06/25] sched/cputime: Add vtime idle task state Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 07/25] sched/cputime: Add vtime guest " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 08/25] vtime: Exit vtime before exit_notify() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 13:54   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 09/25] kcpustat: Track running task following vtime sequences Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 13:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 10/25] context_tracking: Remove context_tracking_active() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 11/25] context_tracking: s/context_tracking_is_enabled/context_tracking_enabled() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 12/25] context_tracking: Rename context_tracking_is_cpu_enabled() to context_tracking_enabled_this_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 13/25] context_tracking: Introduce context_tracking_enabled_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 14:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 14/25] sched/vtime: Rename vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled() to vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:45 ` [PATCH 15/25] sched/vtime: Introduce vtime_accounting_enabled_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 14:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 16/25] sched/cputime: Allow to pass cputime index on user/guest accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 17/25] sched/cputime: Standardize the kcpustat index based accounting functions Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 18/25] vtime: Track nice-ness on top of context switch Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 14:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 19/25] sched/vite: Handle nice updates under vtime Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 14:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 15:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-26 16:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-26 18:41         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 20/25] sched/kcpustat: Introduce vtime-aware kcpustat accessor Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 14:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-20 22:40     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-21  8:18       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-21  8:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-21 16:33         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 21/25] procfs: Use vtime aware " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-20 14:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-20 22:31     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 22/25] cpufreq: " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 23/25] leds: Use vtime aware kcpustat accessors Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 24/25] rackmeter: " Frederic Weisbecker
2018-11-14  2:46 ` [PATCH 25/25] sched/vtime: Clarify vtime_task_switch() argument layout Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181120135459.GR2131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).