From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57942C43441 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1268D213A2 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b2JdEUP/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1268D213A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729259AbeK3DNR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 22:13:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58828 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728782AbeK3DNR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 22:13:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A4D521019; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:07:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1543507645; bh=jbjQKyJFpluvQ4e9ejq2Z2Id2I7VfeaRc3CMKImKzbY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b2JdEUP/ED1GFAjhu65dYbVBfwHtbTRhYw/cgjCLXVCua6WE9bh2/aKWMXViL8tJ+ jEDcoRZH15RK+JfpUsVehDAW2tgxbmK+TdqUJgYHdPNrrGwBVF9eVMy2lbRKmEvofO Nluwxa5Ti5aghRUyZByWF7S3BLfwy+/cvH78Q0Tw= Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:07:22 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Tigran Aivazian Cc: LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa , syzbot , Andrew Morton , willy@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 033/110] bfs: add sanity check at bfs_fill_super() Message-ID: <20181129160722.GA31919@kroah.com> References: <20181129135921.231283053@linuxfoundation.org> <20181129135922.602882966@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.0 (2018-11-25) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, of course I object to it. I ignored this version of the patch > being applied to the older Linux versions, but for the latest versions > surely the version that I have authored should be applied instead. I > have sent to Andrew Morton both the 4.20-rc1 and 4.19.2 versions of > the patch. The 4.20 was applied (as "linux-next", I don't know why it > is not in 4.20-rc4 yet), but 4.19.2 version was not applied yet, so > here it is attached again (with the proper changelog etc). It applies > to 4.19.5 cleanly as well, so please use this version (attached). I can not apply a patch to the stable trees that are not in Linus's tree first. So there's nothing I can do here with this. Until then, I'll take the patch that is already in Linus's tree, which is what I did here, thanks. greg k-h